№ files_lp_4_process_3_120152
File format: docx
Character count: 3618
File size: 63 KB
Year:
2023
Region / City:
HMP Bronzefield
Topic:
Job Description
Document Type:
Job Description
Organization / Institution:
Sodexo
Author:
Lauren Arthur
Target Audience:
Internal staff of Sodexo and HM Prison Bronzefield
Effective Period:
N/A
Approval Date:
03/12/2023
Amendment Date:
N/A
Price: 8 / 10 USD
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
Don’t have cryptocurrency yet?
You can still complete your purchase in a few minutes:- Buy Crypto in a trusted app (Coinbase, Kraken, Cash App or any similar service).
- In the app, tap Send.
- Select network, paste our wallet address.
- Send the exact amount shown above.
The final amount may vary slightly depending on the payment method.
The file will be sent to the email address provided at checkout within 24 hours.
The product description is provided for reference. Actual content and formatting may differ slightly.
Year:
2025
Region / City:
N/A
Topic:
QoS monitoring, UPF relocation, PDU session release
Document Type:
Change Request
Organization / Institution:
3GPP
Author:
ETRI
Target Audience:
N/A
Period of Action:
2025-01-20 – 2025-01-24
Approval Date:
2025-01-20
Date of Changes:
N/A
Year:
2025
Region / City:
Online
Topic:
Dynamic Policy API, 5G, PDU handling
Document Type:
Change Request
Organization:
3GPP
Author:
Lenovo, Nokia, InterDigital Communications, BBC
Target Audience:
5G Network Developers
Period of Action:
2025-07-14
Approval Date:
2025-07-14
Modification Date:
Not specified
Summary:
This document proposes changes to the Dynamic Policy API in 5G systems, particularly in how unmarked PDU information and dynamic traffic characteristics are handled.
Year:
2025
Region / City:
Online
Topic:
Telecommunications
Document Type:
Change Request
Organization / Institution:
3GPP
Author:
Huawei, HiSilicon
Target Audience:
Working Groups, Telecommunications Engineers
Period of Validity:
2025-07-15
Approval Date:
2025-07-15
Change Date:
2025-07-15
Release:
Rel-19
Work Item Code:
5G_RTP_Ph2
Category:
F (Correction)
Clauses Affected:
4.2.4, 4.2.6.3, 4.5.4, 4.5.6
Other Specifications Affected:
None
Test Specifications Affected:
None
O&M Specifications Affected:
None
Comments:
None
Revision History:
CHANGE 14.2.4, CHANGE 24.2.6.3
Summary:
Clarification of requirements and points regarding data burst size and PDU set size in RTP
Year:
2023
Region / city:
Global
Topic:
5G, PDU Set handling, RTP, QoS
Document Type:
Technical paper
Organization / Institution:
Huawei, Hisilicon
Author:
Not specified
Target audience:
SA2, SA4, network engineers
Period of validity:
N/A
Approval date:
N/A
Modification date:
N/A
Year:
2026
Region / City:
Global
Topic:
Networking, 5G
Document Type:
Technical Paper
Organization / Institution:
Huawei, Hisilicon
Author:
N/A
Target Audience:
Network Engineers, Telecom Professionals
Effective Period:
N/A
Approval Date:
N/A
Modification Date:
N/A
Year:
2023
Region / City:
PMI Keystone Chapter
Topic:
Project Management Certifications
Document Type:
Instructional Guide
Organization:
PMI Keystone Chapter
Author:
PMI Keystone Chapter
Target Audience:
PMI certification holders
Period of Action:
Ongoing
Approval Date:
N/A
Modification Date:
N/A
Year:
2020
Region / city:
-
Topic:
5G, Charging Data, PDU Session
Document type:
Change Request
Organization:
3GPP
Author:
Ericsson
Target audience:
Working Groups (TSG-SA5, TSG)
Period of action:
-
Approval date:
-
Date of modifications:
-
Release:
Rel-16
Category:
F (correction)
Work item code:
TEI16, 5GS_Ph1-SBI_CH
Source to WG:
Ericsson
Source to TSG:
S5
Reason for change:
The PDU session information cannot contain any information in the response and the setting for the corresponding supported field is inconsistent
Clauses affected:
6.2.2
Other specs affected:
-
Test specifications affected:
-
O&M Specifications affected:
TS 32.291 CR 0240
Revision history:
First change
Year:
2024
Region / city:
Orlando, USA
Topic:
5G System, RTP Header Extension, PDU Set Marking, QoS
Document type:
Technical Report
Organization / institution:
Huawei, HiSilicon
Author:
Huawei, HiSilicon
Target audience:
3GPP participants, 5G system developers, network engineers
Period of validity:
November 2024
Approval date:
November 2024
Amendment date:
Not provided
Year:
2024
Region / City:
Orlando
Topic:
RTP Traffic Multiplexing
Document Type:
Technical Report
Organization:
3GPP
Author:
Huawei, HiSilicon
Target Audience:
Technical professionals, engineers in RTP and QoS systems
Effective Period:
Release 19
Approval Date:
Not specified
Modification Date:
Not specified
Year:
2024
Region / City:
Orlando, Florida, USA
Theme:
5G System, RTP, Multiplexing, QoS
Document Type:
Change Request (CR)
Author:
Huawei, HiSilicon
Target Audience:
Technical stakeholders in 5G system design
Work Item Code:
FS_5G_RTP_Ph2
Date:
25-10-2024
Category:
B
Release:
19
Affected Specifications:
3GPP TS 23.501, 3GPP TS 38.415
Clausules Affected:
6.X (new clause)
Reason for Change:
Solution for RTP HE usage in media multiplexing
Summary of Change:
This document provides guidelines for applying RTP Header Extension (HE) for PDU Set marking in multiplexed media scenarios, ensuring proper QoS handling in 5G systems.
Consequences if Not Approved:
Limited practical adoption of RTP HE for PDU Set marking
Other Comments:
This CR includes all new text for RTP HE in multiplexed scenarios.
Year:
2024
Region / City:
Orlando
Theme:
5G System, RTP Header Extension, PDU Set Marking
Document Type:
Technical Report
Organization / Institution:
3GPP
Author:
Huawei, HiSilicon
Target Audience:
5G System Engineers, Network Operators, RTP Specialists
Period of validity:
N/A
Approval Date:
N/A
Date of Changes:
N/A
Year:
2024
Location:
Orlando, Florida, USA
Subject:
5G System, RTP Header Extension, PDU Set QoS, Multiplexing
Document type:
Change Request (CR)
Organization:
3GPP TSG-SA WG4
Author:
Huawei, HiSilicon
Work item code:
FS_5G_RTP_Ph2
Category:
B (addition of feature)
Release:
19
Date of submission:
25-10-2024
Clauses affected:
6.X (new clause)
References:
3GPP TS 23.501, 3GPP TS 29.571, 3GPP TS 38.415, IANA RTP Parameters
Consequences if not approved:
KI not addressed, practical adoption of RTP HE for PDU Set marking limited
Year:
2024
Region / City:
Orlando, USA
Topic:
RTP Multiplexing, PDU Set Marking
Document Type:
Technical Specification
Organization / Institution:
3GPP
Author:
Huawei, HiSilicon
Target Audience:
3GPP Technical Groups, Networking Engineers
Period of Validity:
Not specified
Approval Date:
Not specified
Amendment Date:
Not specified
Year:
2025
Region / City:
Geneva
Subject:
5G Network, PDU Handling
Document Type:
Change Request
Organization / Institution:
3GPP
Author:
Huawei, HiSilicon
Target Audience:
Technical experts, Network engineers
Period of Validity:
Until approval of the change request
Approval Date:
2025-01-13
Change Date:
Not specified
Release:
Rel-19
Category:
B (addition of feature)
Work Item Code:
5G_RTP_Ph2
Consequences if Not Approved:
Incomplete goals for the study item, confusion on lone PDU case
Clauses Affected:
A.X (new sub clause), clause 2
Other Affected Specifications:
TS/TR ... CR ...
Other Comments:
Revision history clarifications
Contextual Description:
A guideline for handling marked and unmarked PDUs in a 5G network element, specifically addressing the handling of lone PDUs in systems such as the UPF.
Year:
2024
Organization:
3GPP SA4-e RTC SWG
Work item code:
FS_5G_RTP_Ph2
Category:
B (addition of feature)
Release:
19
Source to WG:
Huawei, HiSilicon
Source to TSG:
SA WG 4
Date submitted:
11-10-2024
Affected components:
UICC apps, ME, Radio Access Network, Core Network
Clauses affected:
4, 4.1, 4.2
References:
3GPP TS 29.571, 3GPP TS 38.415, RTP Parameters (iana.org)
Type of document:
Change Request
Summary:
Guidelines for marking PDU Sets in RTP streams for lone and multiplexed PDUs, including QoS handling and scenarios where SSRC-based packet filtering cannot be applied.
Note:
Year
Year:
[insert date of swearing]
Jurisdiction:
High Court
Document type:
Oath and Bond
Subject:
Estate administration of deceased
Deceased name:
[insert all variations of the name]
Deceased address:
[insert address]
Date of death:
[insert date]
Place of death:
[insert place]
Applicant name:
[insert name]
Applicant address:
[insert address]
Gross value of estate:
[insert value]
Administrator relationship to deceased:
[state relationship]
Witnessed by:
Commissioner for Oaths / Practising Solicitor
Filing:
Filed with High Court on [insert date]
Year:
20XX
Region / City:
[not specified]
Subject:
Probate, Administration of Estate
Document Type:
Legal Form
Author:
[not specified]
Period of Validity:
[not specified]
Approval Date:
[not specified]
Amendment Date:
[not specified]
Year:
20
Region / city:
High Court
Topic:
Administration Bond, Probate
Document type:
Legal Form
Organization / institution:
High Court
Author:
Not specified
Target audience:
Legal professionals, applicants for administration
Period of validity:
Not specified
Approval date:
Not specified
Date of amendments:
Not specified
Year:
2017
Region / City:
Oregon
Topic:
Education, Teacher and Administrator Evaluation, Student Learning and Growth Goals
Document Type:
Guide
Organization:
Oregon Department of Education
Author:
Oregon Educator Effectiveness Workgroup
Target Audience:
Educators (Teachers and Administrators)
Period of Validity:
2017 and ongoing
Approval Date:
2017
Date of Changes:
2017