№ lp_2_1_15815
File format: docx
Character count: 2134
File size: 20 KB
A legal decision from the Division of Administrative Law Appeals regarding the default of Dr. Emmanuel Rodriguez, recommending disciplinary action after his failure to respond to official notices.
Year:
2020
Region / City:
Suffolk
Subject:
Administrative law, Medical regulation
Document type:
Legal decision
Organ / Institution:
Division of Administrative Law Appeals, Board of Registration in Medicine
Author:
Bonney Cashin
Target audience:
Legal professionals, Medical board members, Administrative law practitioners
Effective period:
Not specified
Approval date:
January 15, 2021
Amendment date:
Not specified
Price: 8 / 10 USD
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
Don’t have cryptocurrency yet?
You can still complete your purchase in a few minutes:- Buy Crypto in a trusted app (Coinbase, Kraken, Cash App or any similar service).
- In the app, tap Send.
- Select network, paste our wallet address.
- Send the exact amount shown above.
The final amount may vary slightly depending on the payment method.
The file will be sent to the email address provided at checkout within 24 hours.
The product description is provided for reference. Actual content and formatting may differ slightly.
Note:
Year
Topic:
KiwiSaver, default provider, investment mandate, responsible investment
Document type:
Submission template
Year:
Not specified
Region / city:
Not specified
Topic:
IT Configuration, Networking
Document Type:
Instructional Guide
Author:
Not specified
Target Audience:
IT professionals, Network administrators
Period of validity:
Not specified
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of changes:
Not specified
Contextual description:
A technical guide explaining how to modify default values for plink.exe used by iMC on Windows systems by configuring Putty and exporting settings to the iMC server.
Note:
Year
Year:
2025
Region / City:
Napa County, California
Topic:
Property Tax Delinquency
Document Type:
Public Notice
Organ / Institution:
Napa County Tax Collector
Author:
Robert G. Minahen
Target Audience:
Property Owners in Napa County
Effective Period:
From July 1, 2025
Approval Date:
May 15, 2025
Amendment Date:
None
Year:
Not specified
Region / city:
Not specified
Topic:
Well-to-Tank default emission factors
Document type:
Template
Institution:
Not specified
Author:
Not specified
Target audience:
Not specified
Period of validity:
Not specified
Approval date:
Not specified
Modification date:
Not specified
Note:
Year
Topic:
Emission Factors
Document Type:
Template
Year:
20XX
Region / City:
San Diego, California
Theme:
Bankruptcy Procedure
Document Type:
Legal Notice
Agency / Institution:
U.S. Bankruptcy Court
Author:
Unknown
Target Audience:
Debtors, Lenders, Legal Professionals
Period of Effect:
Not specified
Date of Approval:
Not specified
Date of Amendments:
Not specified
Note:
Year
Region / City:
Ontario
Subject:
Court Procedure, Small Claims
Document Type:
Legal Form
Organization / Institution:
Ontario Superior Court of Justice
Target Audience:
Legal Professionals, Plaintiffs, Defendants
Year:
2020
Note:
Region / City
Topic:
Wireless LANs, Multi-Link Operation
Document Type:
Technical Proposal
Organization / Institution:
IEEE
Author:
Laurent Cariou
Target Audience:
Technical specialists in wireless networks
Context description:
Technical proposal related to IEEE 802.11be standards for multi-link operation, specifically TID-to-link mapping and link management.
Year:
2023
Region / City:
Victoria, Australia
Topic:
Legal procedures for Default Judgment
Document Type:
Guidelines
Agency / Institution:
County Court of Victoria
Author:
Not specified
Target Audience:
Legal professionals, litigants
Period of Validity:
Ongoing
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of Amendments:
Not specified
Request for Hearing and Default by Clerk for Final Parenting Plan in Montana Judicial District Court
State:
Montana
Court:
Judicial District Court
County:
Unspecified county
Document type:
Court filing form
Case type:
Parenting plan and child custody
Subject:
Request for hearing and entry of default
Parties:
Petitioner, Respondent, Co-Petitioners
Minor children:
Referenced
Hearing types:
Default hearing, uncontested hearing, contested hearing
Child support documentation:
Proposed Child Support Guidelines Calculation Worksheet or Child Support Enforcement Division Child Support Order
Representation status:
Appearing without a lawyer
Legal declaration:
Statement under penalty of perjury under Montana law
Intended filer:
Petitioner, Respondent, or Co-Petitioner
Jurisdiction:
State of Montana
Note:
Year
Subject:
Legal Process
Document Type:
Court Form
Organization / Institution:
Montana Judicial District Court
Target Audience:
Individuals involved in legal proceedings, petitioners, respondents, and co-petitioners
Year:
2019
Note:
Region / City
Subject:
Wireless communication, network standards
Document Type:
Technical standard
Organization / Institution:
IEEE
Author:
Matthew Fischer
Target Audience:
Engineers, network professionals
Approval Date:
2019-01-01
Context:
Technical document related to modifications in the IEEE 802.11 wireless communication standard, specifically concerning default parameters for UORA (UL OFDMA-based Random Access).
Year:
2023
Region / City:
Eastern District of North Carolina
Topic:
Legal Procedure
Document Type:
Court Order
Organization / Institution:
United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina
Author:
United States District Court
Target Audience:
Parties involved in the case
Period of Action:
Until Final Disposition
Date of Approval:
Not specified
Date of Amendments:
Not specified
) and join the S1NET. For guides with in depth examinations of performance measure definitions, go to:
https://www.milsuite.mil/book/docs/DOC-129783
Table of Contents (Hyperlinks to Sections):
Developing ‘Significant Duties and Responsibilities’ OER Narratives: Notes, Rules, and Instructions OER Narrative Prohibited Techniques, Inconsistencies, No-Go’s: Negative Comment Rules Referred OERs Narrative Comment Examples Block a. APFT and HT/WT Block b. Overall Performance Block c. Character (to include SHARP comments) Block d. Presence Block e. Intellect Block f. Leads Block g. Develops Block h. Achieves Senior Rater Potential Senior Rater Narrative Examples Senior Rater Narrative Comment Examples (for potential, promotion, school, etc.) Successive Assignments Other SR Comments (explanations of anything unusual about OER) Effective Words for Evaluations JUNIOR OFFICER PLATE (DA FORM 67-10-1) NOTE: 2LTs who have NOT completed BOLC, will not receive an OER until they complete BOLC (AC and ARNG; USAR officers can receive an OER before completing BOLC). The FROM date will be their commissioning date. All time until their BOLC graduation will be NONRATED on their first OER. OER PROFILING: OERs: Rater and Senior Rater Profiles are CONSTRAINED, meaning Officers are only allowed to grant 49% of each rank they rate with either an “EXCELS” (as Rater) or “MOST QUALIFIED” (as Senior Rater). HOWEVER, if you have an immature profile, and have only just begun rating/senior rating Officers of a certain rank, you are allowed a ONE TIME option of giving one of the first two evaluations you make at a particular grade, an “EXCELS” (as Rater) or “MOST QUALIFIED” (as Senior Rater). OER (OER SUPPORT FORM) PART III: Developing ‘Significant Duties and Responsibilities’ (blocks a., b., and c.): Refer to DA PAM 611-21 (https://www.milsuite.mil/book/groups/smartbookdapam611-21
) and DA PAM 600-3 (Commissioned Officer Professional Development and Career Management), to assist in the development of PART III, block d. As a minimum, the duty description will include pr:
- Number of personnel supervised, - Amount of resources under the rated officer’s control, - Scope of responsibilities. 3) Descriptions must be clear and concise with emphasis on specific functions required. 4) Note conditions unique to the assignment; e.g. RA officers assigned to FT support duties with RC units or USAR officers assigned to RA units OER NARRATIVES: Notes, Rules, and Instructions Rater and Senior Rater Narratives: - Requires candor and courage; frank and accurate assessment. - Quantify officer’s value relative to peers and do so in concert with rater/senior rater box check. - Are short; tell a simple story about the quality of officer being evaluated. - Are interesting and compelling. - Are looked at by selection board members when they are looking for in-depth information about a rated officer’s performance and potential. - Numbers; 1-10, write them out (e.g. one, two, ten). 11 or higher, write the number; e.g. 11, 15, 105. Exception, when a 1-10 is WITH an 11 or higher; e.g. “5 tool kits with 20 tools each.” - Fashion the narrative to the officer; double check use of “he/his” vs. “she/hers.” - Awards: Awards and/or special recognition received during the rating period may be cited in evaluation comments (for example, “received the Humanitarian Service Medal” or “named the Instructor of the Year”). - Raters and SR CAN use the officer’s name in the narrative; e.g. “1LT Joe was ….” Rater and Rater Narratives: - Focus on PERFORMANCE; explaining what the rated officer did and how well he/she did it. - Focus on specifics to quantify and qualify performance. - Raters should advocate the rated officer to the SR. - When there is no SR (due to lack of qualifications), rater’s narrative provides the input on both performance and potential. Senior Rater (SR) and SR Narrative (see SR Rater Narrative section for examples): - Focus on POTENTIAL, 3-5 years out (promotions, command, school, & assignments). - Can amplify box checks by using the narrative to clearly send the appropriate message to selection boards. - CANNOT mention Box Check. - Additional information for when SR is also Rater can be found in DA PAM 623-3, pg. 26, “DA Form 67–10–1, part VI: block c—Senior Rater Narrative.” OER Narrative Prohibited Techniques, Inconsistencies, No-Go’s: - School/Course Comments: Bullets about how a Soldier did in a school or course are ONLY allowed if that school did not produce an AER/DA Form 1059. - Narratives are not a laundry list of superlatives – more is not necessarily better. - Brief, unqualified superlatives or phrases, particularly if they may be considered trite. - Excessive use of technical acronyms, or phrases not commonly recognized. - Techniques aimed at making specific words, phrases, or sentences stand out from the rest of the narrative; e.g. excessive use of capital letters; unnecessary quotation marks; repeated use of exclamation points; wide spacing between selected words, phrases, or sentences to include double spacing within a paragraph or between paragraphs. - Inappropriate references to box checks; e.g “Would be TOP BLOCK if profile allowed” or “absolutely far exceeded the standard”. - Trying to quantify (e.g. “top 2% of my captains”) with a small population. - Stay in your lane/level; avoid comments like “Best 1LT in the Army” unless you’re the Army CoS. - Stating “the best ever”; having 10 in the population, 50 in the profile. - Using overused phrases and clichés that are counterproductive or overused; e.g. stellar, historic, “delivered a dazzling performance,” “hit the ground running,” consummate professional, and unlimited potential. - Using specific selection board-type language. Examples of this include, “definitely a 6+ Soldier”. - Don’t exaggerate; “If I could prove it, CPT X is an LTC disguised as a CPT.” - Be mindful of what IS NOT said; it can have the same impact as what is said; e.g. NOT having numbers, or quantifiable points. - Don’t say the sa
Note:
en
Topic:
Officer Evaluation, Narrative Guidelines
Document Type:
Guide
Target Audience:
Raters, Senior Raters
Note:
and the site visit team chair eight (8) weeks prior to the site visit)(4.2024)
Year:
2024
Region / City:
N/A
Theme:
Accreditation
Document Type:
Schedule Template
Organization / Institution:
ARC-PA
Author:
N/A
Target Audience:
Program administrators, Site visit team
Period of Validity:
N/A
Approval Date:
N/A
Modification Date:
N/A
Year:
2022
Organizations:
Peninsula Clean Energy (PCE), Silicon Valley Clean Energy (SVCE), East Bay Community Energy (EBCE)
Document Type:
Code Amendment Recommendations
Scope:
Residential and Nonresidential EV Charging Requirements
Version Dates:
May 11, 2022; July 8, 2022; September 2022; October 2022
Target Audience:
Local jurisdictions and code administrators
Reference:
2022 Title 24 Part 11 California Green Building Standards Code (CALGreen)
Topics:
EV Charging Stations, EV Ready Spaces, Direct Current Fast Charging, Automatic Load Management Systems, Multifamily and Nonresidential Buildings
URL:
BayAreaReachCodes.Org
Year:
2022
Region / city:
California
Theme:
Water Quality, Environmental Assessment
Document Type:
Technical Report
Organization / Institution:
Caltrans
Author:
Not specified
Target Audience:
Environmental regulators, project managers
Period of validity:
Not specified
Approval Date:
Not specified
Modification Date:
Not specified
Year:
2021
Region / City:
Idaho
Topic:
Conservation, Big Game Species
Document Type:
Guideline
Agency:
Bureau of Land Management (BLM), Idaho Department of Fish and Game (IDFG)
Author:
Bureau of Land Management (BLM)
Target Audience:
Wildlife managers, conservationists, land management authorities
Effective Period:
Ongoing
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of Changes:
Not specified