№ files_lp_3_process_7_021176
File format: docx
Character count: 2816
File size: 18 KB
Instructional support guide outlining procedures and requirements for submitting Technical Assistance Center service requests and managing contract access within Cisco support systems.
Organization:
Cisco Systems
Document Type:
Support procedure guide
Subject:
Creation of Technical Assistance Center (TAC) Service Requests
Scope:
Submission of SRs by phone, email, and online
Contact Phone (United States):
1-800-553-2447
Contact Email:
[email protected]
Online Submission URL:
https://tools.cisco.com/ServiceRequestTool/scm/mgmt/case
Required Information:
Cisco.com user ID (CCO ID) and service contract number
Severity Levels Covered:
Severity-1, Severity-2, Severity-3, Severity-4
Related Products:
Tidal Enterprise Scheduler; Tidal Enterprise Reporter; Tidal Enterprise Transporter; Cisco Process Orchestrator (CPO); Cisco Intelligent Automation for Cloud (CIAC); Cisco Prime Service Catalog (CPSC); Transaction Analyzer (TA); Terma JAWS
Additional Topic:
Linking Cisco.com profile to service contract number
Intended Audience:
Customers with active Cisco service contracts
Price: 8 / 10 USD
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
Don’t have cryptocurrency yet?
You can still complete your purchase in a few minutes:- Buy Crypto in a trusted app (Coinbase, Kraken, Cash App or any similar service).
- In the app, tap Send.
- Select network, paste our wallet address.
- Send the exact amount shown above.
The final amount may vary slightly depending on the payment method.
The file will be sent to the email address provided at checkout within 24 hours.
The product description is provided for reference. Actual content and formatting may differ slightly.
Version:
Draft 2.0 | Effective: //_____ | Owner: Director of Special Education / 504 Coordinator | Approved by: __________________________
Year:
Draft 2.0
Region / City:
Midland ISD
Subject:
Special Education, Section 504
Document Type:
Manual
Organization / Institution:
Midland Independent School District
Author:
Director of Special Education
Target Audience:
School staff, administrators, special education professionals
Period of Validity:
Not specified
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of Changes:
Not specified
Contextual description:
A procedural manual for special education and Section 504 practices in Midland ISD, providing detailed operational steps for child find, referrals, evaluations, and compliance with federal and state regulations.
Year:
2013
Region / City:
Cowlitz County, Washington
Theme:
Shoreline Management Program
Document Type:
Meeting Summary
Organization / Institution:
Washington State Department of Ecology (ECY), National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), Cowlitz County
Author:
Sarah Sandstrom, The Watershed Company
Target Audience:
TAC members, government officials, stakeholders in shoreline management
Period of Action:
2013
Approval Date:
Not specified
Modification Date:
Not specified
Year:
2023
Region / City:
Victoria, Australia
Theme:
Transport Accident Claims, Medical Examination
Document Type:
Form
Agency / Organization:
Transport Accident Commission (TAC)
Author:
Not specified
Target Audience:
Lawyers representing clients in TAC claims
Period of validity:
Not specified
Approval Date:
Not specified
Modification Date:
Not specified
Year:
2025
Region / City:
Victoria
Topic:
Employment Agreement
Document Type:
Enterprise Agreement
Organization:
Transport Accident Commission (TAC)
Author:
Transport Accident Commission (TAC)
Target Audience:
TAC employees
Period of Validity:
2025-2029
Approval Date:
Not specified
Amendment Date:
Not specified
Year:
[Year]
Region / City:
[Region]
Theme:
Project Management
Document Type:
Guide
Organization / Institution:
[Organization Name]
Author:
[Author Name]
Target Audience:
Project Managers, Project Teams
Effective Period:
[Start Date] - [End Date]
Approval Date:
[Date]
Modification Date:
[Date]
Context:
This document serves as a template for tracking project status and changes during the Executing, Monitoring, and Controlling phase of a project.
Year:
2024
Region / City:
Taiwan
Topic:
Travel Authorization
Document Type:
Form
Organization:
Visa Network
Author:
Visa Network
Target Audience:
Eligible passport holders from Cambodia, India, Laos, Myanmar, and Vietnam
Effective Period:
3 months
Approval Date:
Not specified
Amendment Date:
Not specified
Year:
2020
Region / City:
Pinellas County, Palm Beach County, Miami-Dade County, Broward County
Subject:
Plumbing, Fuel Gas, Building Code Amendments
Document Type:
Technical Amendment
Organization / Institution:
Pinellas County Construction Industry Licensing Board (PCCLB), Palm Beach County, Miami-Dade County, Broward County
Author:
Not specified
Target Audience:
Construction industry professionals, local building authorities
Effective Period:
Not specified
Approval Date:
Not specified
Amendment Date:
Not specified
Year:
2021
Region / city:
Global
Topic:
Tracking Area Code (TAC) update procedures for satellite networks
Document type:
Discussion document
Organization / institution:
3GPP
Author:
CMCCT
Target audience:
Network operators, satellite service providers, and equipment manufacturers
Period of validity:
2021-02-01 - 2021-02-02
Approval date:
2021-02-01
Date of changes:
Not specified
Date:
December 10, 2025
Region / City:
Lima, Ohio
Subject:
Transportation Advisory Committee Meeting
Document Type:
Meeting Notice
Organization:
Lima-Allen County Regional Planning Commission
Author:
Ron Meyer, Chairman
Target Audience:
Transportation Advisory Committee members
Effective Period:
December 16, 2025
Approval Date:
December 10, 2025
Amendment Date:
N/A
Zoom Link:
https://bit.ly/LACRPC-meetings
Context Description:
Meeting notice for the Transportation Advisory Committee of the Lima-Allen County Regional Planning Commission, outlining the agenda and location of the meeting on December 16, 2025.
Year:
2023
Region / City:
Texas
Theme:
Dental regulations
Document type:
Rule proposal
Organization:
Texas State Board of Dental Examiners
Author:
Casey Nichols, Executive Director
Target Audience:
Dental professionals, regulatory authorities
Effective period:
Not specified
Approval date:
Not specified
Amendment date:
Not specified
Contextual description:
A rule proposal by the Texas State Board of Dental Examiners outlining the requirements for dental hygienists to administer local infiltration anesthesia in compliance with new legislative amendments.
Year:
Not specified
Region / City:
Not specified
Topic:
Client Support, Case Management
Document Type:
Form
Organization:
TAC
Author:
Not specified
Target Audience:
Service providers, TAC claims managers
Period of Action:
Not specified
Date of Approval:
Not specified
Date of Changes:
Not specified
Year:
2006
Region / City:
Texas
Theme:
Liability waiver, Sports events
Document Type:
Release form
Organization / Institution:
Texas Annual Conference
Author:
Texas Annual Conference
Target Audience:
Participants of the Tour de TAC events
Effective Period:
Until event participation
Approval Date:
March 14, 2006
Amendment Date:
N/A
Year:
2022
Region / City:
Doringkop
Subject:
Tender Invitation
Document Type:
Bid Invitation
Institution:
Department of Co-Operative Governance and Traditional Affairs
Author:
Department of Public Works KZN
Target Audience:
Contractors, Suppliers
Period of Validity:
10 October 2022
Approval Date:
10 October 2022
Modification Date:
N/A
Year:
Not specified
State:
Texas
Country:
United States
Regulatory Framework:
Title 30 Texas Administrative Code § 106.143 and § 106.4
Issuing Authority:
Texas Commission on Environmental Quality
Division:
Air Permits Division
Document Type:
Regulatory compliance checklist
Subject:
Air permitting requirements for wet sand and gravel production facilities
Industry Sector:
Sand and gravel production
Production Limit:
500 tons per hour or less
Emission Focus:
Particulate matter (PM10) and road dust emissions
Recordkeeping Requirement:
Five-year retention of compliance records
Recordkeeping Start Date:
April 1, 2002
Compliance Period Basis:
Any consecutive 12-month period
Related Guidance:
U.S. EPA AP-42 Compilation of Air Pollutant Emission Factors
Intended Users:
Permit applicants and permit holders operating wet sand and gravel production facilities
Year:
2026
Region / City:
San Antonio, Texas
Theme:
Retinoblastoma, Fundraising, Medical Conferences
Document Type:
Crowdfunding Page Template
Organization:
WE C Hope USA
Author:
Marissa Gonzalez, Abby White
Target Audience:
Parents, Survivors, Medical Professionals, Supporters
Period of Action:
September 2026
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of Changes:
Not specified
Document type:
Guidance document
Subject area:
Clinical research compliance
Topic:
Corrective and Preventive Action (CAPA)
Applicable field:
Clinical trials
Responsible parties:
Sponsor, monitor, site personnel, principal investigator
Regulatory body referenced:
Institutional Review Board (IRB)
Key components:
Root cause analysis, corrective action, preventive action, follow-up evaluation
Authorship requirements:
Responsible individual or organization
Approval requirements:
Author signature, IRB review
Record retention:
Site regulatory file
Intended use:
Documentation of discrepancies and corrective measures in clinical research
) and join the S1NET. For guides with in depth examinations of performance measure definitions, go to:
https://www.milsuite.mil/book/docs/DOC-129783
Table of Contents (Hyperlinks to Sections):
Developing ‘Significant Duties and Responsibilities’ OER Narratives: Notes, Rules, and Instructions OER Narrative Prohibited Techniques, Inconsistencies, No-Go’s: Negative Comment Rules Referred OERs Narrative Comment Examples Block a. APFT and HT/WT Block b. Overall Performance Block c. Character (to include SHARP comments) Block d. Presence Block e. Intellect Block f. Leads Block g. Develops Block h. Achieves Senior Rater Potential Senior Rater Narrative Examples Senior Rater Narrative Comment Examples (for potential, promotion, school, etc.) Successive Assignments Other SR Comments (explanations of anything unusual about OER) Effective Words for Evaluations JUNIOR OFFICER PLATE (DA FORM 67-10-1) NOTE: 2LTs who have NOT completed BOLC, will not receive an OER until they complete BOLC (AC and ARNG; USAR officers can receive an OER before completing BOLC). The FROM date will be their commissioning date. All time until their BOLC graduation will be NONRATED on their first OER. OER PROFILING: OERs: Rater and Senior Rater Profiles are CONSTRAINED, meaning Officers are only allowed to grant 49% of each rank they rate with either an “EXCELS” (as Rater) or “MOST QUALIFIED” (as Senior Rater). HOWEVER, if you have an immature profile, and have only just begun rating/senior rating Officers of a certain rank, you are allowed a ONE TIME option of giving one of the first two evaluations you make at a particular grade, an “EXCELS” (as Rater) or “MOST QUALIFIED” (as Senior Rater). OER (OER SUPPORT FORM) PART III: Developing ‘Significant Duties and Responsibilities’ (blocks a., b., and c.): Refer to DA PAM 611-21 (https://www.milsuite.mil/book/groups/smartbookdapam611-21
) and DA PAM 600-3 (Commissioned Officer Professional Development and Career Management), to assist in the development of PART III, block d. As a minimum, the duty description will include pr:
- Number of personnel supervised, - Amount of resources under the rated officer’s control, - Scope of responsibilities. 3) Descriptions must be clear and concise with emphasis on specific functions required. 4) Note conditions unique to the assignment; e.g. RA officers assigned to FT support duties with RC units or USAR officers assigned to RA units OER NARRATIVES: Notes, Rules, and Instructions Rater and Senior Rater Narratives: - Requires candor and courage; frank and accurate assessment. - Quantify officer’s value relative to peers and do so in concert with rater/senior rater box check. - Are short; tell a simple story about the quality of officer being evaluated. - Are interesting and compelling. - Are looked at by selection board members when they are looking for in-depth information about a rated officer’s performance and potential. - Numbers; 1-10, write them out (e.g. one, two, ten). 11 or higher, write the number; e.g. 11, 15, 105. Exception, when a 1-10 is WITH an 11 or higher; e.g. “5 tool kits with 20 tools each.” - Fashion the narrative to the officer; double check use of “he/his” vs. “she/hers.” - Awards: Awards and/or special recognition received during the rating period may be cited in evaluation comments (for example, “received the Humanitarian Service Medal” or “named the Instructor of the Year”). - Raters and SR CAN use the officer’s name in the narrative; e.g. “1LT Joe was ….” Rater and Rater Narratives: - Focus on PERFORMANCE; explaining what the rated officer did and how well he/she did it. - Focus on specifics to quantify and qualify performance. - Raters should advocate the rated officer to the SR. - When there is no SR (due to lack of qualifications), rater’s narrative provides the input on both performance and potential. Senior Rater (SR) and SR Narrative (see SR Rater Narrative section for examples): - Focus on POTENTIAL, 3-5 years out (promotions, command, school, & assignments). - Can amplify box checks by using the narrative to clearly send the appropriate message to selection boards. - CANNOT mention Box Check. - Additional information for when SR is also Rater can be found in DA PAM 623-3, pg. 26, “DA Form 67–10–1, part VI: block c—Senior Rater Narrative.” OER Narrative Prohibited Techniques, Inconsistencies, No-Go’s: - School/Course Comments: Bullets about how a Soldier did in a school or course are ONLY allowed if that school did not produce an AER/DA Form 1059. - Narratives are not a laundry list of superlatives – more is not necessarily better. - Brief, unqualified superlatives or phrases, particularly if they may be considered trite. - Excessive use of technical acronyms, or phrases not commonly recognized. - Techniques aimed at making specific words, phrases, or sentences stand out from the rest of the narrative; e.g. excessive use of capital letters; unnecessary quotation marks; repeated use of exclamation points; wide spacing between selected words, phrases, or sentences to include double spacing within a paragraph or between paragraphs. - Inappropriate references to box checks; e.g “Would be TOP BLOCK if profile allowed” or “absolutely far exceeded the standard”. - Trying to quantify (e.g. “top 2% of my captains”) with a small population. - Stay in your lane/level; avoid comments like “Best 1LT in the Army” unless you’re the Army CoS. - Stating “the best ever”; having 10 in the population, 50 in the profile. - Using overused phrases and clichés that are counterproductive or overused; e.g. stellar, historic, “delivered a dazzling performance,” “hit the ground running,” consummate professional, and unlimited potential. - Using specific selection board-type language. Examples of this include, “definitely a 6+ Soldier”. - Don’t exaggerate; “If I could prove it, CPT X is an LTC disguised as a CPT.” - Be mindful of what IS NOT said; it can have the same impact as what is said; e.g. NOT having numbers, or quantifiable points. - Don’t say the sa
Note:
en
Topic:
Officer Evaluation, Narrative Guidelines
Document Type:
Guide
Target Audience:
Raters, Senior Raters
Year:
2024
Region / City:
Middlesex University
Topic:
Research Ethics, Online Survey Tools
Document Type:
Guide
Institution:
Middlesex University
Author:
Middlesex University
Target Audience:
Staff and Students
Period of Validity:
Ongoing
Approval Date:
August 2024
Date of Revisions:
August 2024
Year:
2025
Note:
Region / City
Theme:
Business Software / Presentation Software
Document Type:
Lesson Plan
Author:
Glenda Liddell-White
Target Audience:
Students
Period of Validity:
April 14 – 18, 2025
Contextual Description:
A lesson plan for teaching students how to create and manage professional presentations using Microsoft PowerPoint.