№ files_lp_3_process_9_05953
File format: docx
Character count: 1914
File size: 27 KB
A legal annotation analyzing key Supreme Court decisions regarding vicarious liability in copyright infringement cases.
Year:
1984, 2005, 2007
Region / City:
United States
Theme:
Copyright Law, Infringement, Legal Precedents
Document Type:
Legal Annotation
Organization / Institution:
United States Supreme Court
Author:
Not specified
Target Audience:
Legal professionals, scholars, students of law
Effective Period:
Not specified
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of Changes:
Not specified
Price: 8 / 10 USD
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
Don’t have cryptocurrency yet?
You can still complete your purchase in a few minutes:- Buy Crypto in a trusted app (Coinbase, Kraken, Cash App or any similar service).
- In the app, tap Send.
- Select network, paste our wallet address.
- Send the exact amount shown above.
The final amount may vary slightly depending on the payment method.
The file will be sent to the email address provided at checkout within 24 hours.
The product description is provided for reference. Actual content and formatting may differ slightly.
Publication Date:
January 5, 2022
Type of Document:
Legal guidance / court instructions
Jurisdiction:
United States
Subject:
Vicarious liability, agency law, partnership liability
Intended Audience:
Jury or legal practitioners
Legal Concepts:
Actual authority, apparent authority, agency, partnership responsibility
Parties Mentioned:
PLF (Plaintiff), DFT (Defendant), AGT (Agent), PTNR (Partner)
Year:
2026
Jurisdiction:
Colorado, United States
Subject:
Traffic law, tort law, duty of care
Document Type:
Legal code excerpt / judicial instructions
Issuing Authority:
Colorado Court of Appeals
Applicable Population:
Drivers, pedestrians, bicyclists
Legal References:
Colorado Revised Statutes §§ 42-4-701 to 42-4-1412; Restatement (Second) of Torts
Case Citations:
Horton v. Mondragon, Clibon v. Wayman, Hansen v. Dillon, Radetsky v. Leonard, Doran v. Jensen
Document Scope:
Chapters 11:1–11:18
Enactment Date:
Various case decisions 1953–2020
Intended Use:
Judicial instructions for negligence and traffic cases
Year:
2023
Region / city:
Victoria, Melbourne
Topic:
Road Safety, Statutory Declarations, Legal Procedures
Document type:
Statutory declaration
Author:
Not specified
Target audience:
Individuals applying for an infringement extension
Effective period:
Not specified
Approval date:
Not specified
Modification date:
Not specified
Year:
2018
Region / City:
Victoria
Topic:
Road Safety, Statutory Declarations
Document Type:
Statutory Declaration
Authority:
Oaths and Affirmations Act 2018
Target Audience:
Authorized company representatives
Validity Period:
Not specified
Approval Date:
Not specified
Amendment Date:
Not specified
Year:
2026
Jurisdiction:
Nigeria
Subject:
Copyright Law
Document Type:
Legal Opinion / Case Analysis
Institution:
Nigerian Legal System
Author:
Legal Advisor
Case Parties:
OYENIYI WURAOLA (John), Ope
Legal Issues:
Originality, Fixation, Author Qualification, Infringement
Applicable Law:
Copyright Act, Nigeria
Key Cases Referenced:
Ladbroke Football Ltd v. William Hill Football Ltd; University of London Press v. University Tutorial Press; Yeni Anikulapo Kuti & Ors v. T.M Iseli & Ors
Year:
2024
Issuing Authority:
Directorate General for Civil Aviation Regulation (DGCAR)
Department:
Air Navigation Safety Department
Document Type:
Application Form / Checklist
Revision:
01
Date Issued:
30 November 2024
Purpose:
Initial or Renewal Certification of BRA Infringement Study Service Provider
Applicant:
Service provider submitting the application
Required Documents:
Cover letter, forms 171-4 and 171-5, proof of fee payment, regulatory compliance statement, organization exposition, staff qualifications, supporting certificates, tools and software details, sample report, quality management statement, ISO certificate if available
Scope:
Aeronautical studies including Obstacle control, Navigation Aid safeguarding, Electromagnetic Compatibility and Interference, CNS engineering analysis, Hazard Identification and Safety risk assessment, Aviation environment
Application Type:
Initial or Renewal
Fee Policy:
Application fee non-refundable, certification fee billed upon approval
Year:
2026
Region:
Australia
Subject:
Patent Law, Intellectual Property, Method Claims
Document Type:
Academic Article
Institution:
University / Legal Research Institute (implied)
Author:
Johnathon E Liddicoat
Target Audience:
Legal scholars, patent attorneys, policymakers
Legal Context:
Patents Act 1990 (Cth), Australian patent law, US Supreme Court precedents (Akamai, McKesson)
Key Concepts:
Divided performance, procured infringement, direct and indirect patent infringement
Case Studies:
Akamai Technologies Inc v Limelight Networks Inc, McKesson Technology v Epic Systems
Recommendations:
Codification of procured infringement in Australian patent law
Year:
1994
Region / City:
Western Australia
Subject:
Legal regulations on fines, penalties, and enforcement procedures
Document Type:
Legal regulation
Authority:
Government of Western Australia
Author:
Not specified
Target Audience:
Legal professionals, law enforcement, public officials
Effective Period:
Ongoing
Approval Date:
1994
Amendment Date:
20 Aug 2013
Document Type:
Administrative form
Subject:
Infringement appeal submission
Purpose:
Submission of an appeal regarding an issued infringement
Fields Included:
Infringement Number; Vehicle Registration Number; Title; Name; Address; Suburb; Postcode; Phone Number; Status (Staff/Student/Visitor); Appeal statement; Signature; Date
Submission Method:
Online upload
Submission Portal:
https://finepayments.com.au/uq
Related Topic:
Parking or regulatory infringement review
Intended Users:
Staff; Students; Visitors
Format:
Written appeal form
Year:
1978
Court:
United States District Court for the Southern District of New York
Case Citation:
460 F. Supp. 40
Judge:
Frankel, D.J.
Parties:
Margaret Walker Alexander (Plaintiff) v. Alex Haley; Doubleday & Company, Inc.; Doubleday Publishing Company (Defendants)
Document Type:
Judicial opinion / court decision
Legal Area:
Copyright law; unfair competition
Subject:
Alleged copyright infringement between literary works Roots, Jubilee, and How I Wrote Jubilee
Works Discussed:
Roots; Jubilee; How I Wrote Jubilee
Plaintiff Works Copyright Years:
1966; 1972
Defendant Work Copyright Year:
1976
Jurisdiction:
United States
Procedural Posture:
Motions for summary judgment by defendants
Decision:
Defendants’ motions for summary judgment granted
Key Legal Issues:
Actual copying; substantial similarity; protectability of historical facts, common sources, scenes a faire, and stock language
Relevant Historical Context:
Literary depictions of slavery and African American family history in the United States
Year:
2023
Course:
PLEG 235
Week:
2D
Topic:
Trademark Infringement Claims
Document Type:
Academic Assignment / Legal Research Exercise
Institution:
Law School / University
Author:
Student (unspecified)
Target Audience:
Law students
Primary Sources Referenced:
Lanham (Trademark) Act (15 U.S.C.), Federal Defend Trade Secrets Act, Restatement of Torts (1939)
Secondary Sources Referenced:
Milgrim on Trade Secrets § 15.01, United States Court for Ninth Circuit website, Lexis Nexis News Blog, Farlex Law Dictionary
Case Examples Cited:
Sweet Lorraine’s by Sweet Lorraine Systems, LLC vs. Sweet Lorraine Bakery, LLC; Beard Research, Inc. v. Kates, 2010 Del. Ch. LEXIS 75
Year:
2024
Region / City:
Rosslyn, Virginia, USA
Subject:
Medical Imaging, Neurophysiology
Document Type:
Supplement
Organization / Institution:
DICOM Standards Committee, Working Group 32
Author:
Working Group 32, Neurophysiology Waveforms
Target Audience:
Medical professionals, researchers in neurophysiology and medical imaging
Effective Period:
Ongoing
Approval Date:
January 2024
Date of Changes:
November 2023
Year:
2024
Region / city:
Geneva
Topic:
Human Rights
Document Type:
Official UN Document
Organization / Institution:
Human Rights Council
Author:
United Nations Human Rights Council
Target audience:
United Nations member states, human rights organizations, and stakeholders in international law
Period of validity:
18 June–12 July 2024
Approval date:
8 May 2024
Amendment date:
Not specified
Note:
Context
Year:
2022
Region / City:
Geneva
Subject:
Human rights
Document Type:
Report
Organ / Institution:
United Nations Human Rights Council
Author:
United Nations
Target Audience:
Member States of the United Nations
Period of validity:
28 February–1 April 2022
Approval Date:
17 January 2022
Date of Changes:
None
Note:
Course Number
Year:
2024
Region / City:
N/A
Document Type:
Book Annotations
Organization / Institution:
N/A
Author:
N/A
Target Audience:
Children, Educators, Parents
Effective Date:
N/A
Date of Approval:
N/A
Date of Changes:
N/A
Year:
2021
Region / City:
Bethesda, MD, USA
Topic:
Malaria, Medical Imaging
Document Type:
Dataset
Organization:
National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health
Author:
Yasmin M Kassim, Feng Yang, Hang Yu, Richard J Maude, Stefan Jaeger
Target Audience:
Researchers in medical imaging and parasitology
Data Format:
JPEG images with TXT annotation files
Number of Subjects:
150 patients
Images per Subject:
~20
Annotation Details:
Parasite positions and types, circle coordinates
License:
Creative Commons Attribution
Date of Compilation:
06/03/2021
Year:
2012
Region / City:
Worldwide
Theme:
Business Intelligence, File Formats, Open Specifications
Document Type:
Technical Documentation
Organization / Institution:
Microsoft
Author:
Microsoft
Target Audience:
Developers, Technical Implementers
Period of Validity:
Ongoing
Approval Date:
7/16/2012
Amendment Date:
Multiple revisions from 2012 to 2017
Year:
2022
Region / City:
Not specified
Topic:
Cancer research, genomics, histology
Document Type:
Supplementary information
Organization / Institution:
The Jackson Laboratory for Genomic Medicine, Bioinformatics Institute (BII), Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR), and others
Author:
Brian S White, Xing Yi Woo, Soner Koc, Todd Sheridan, Steven B Neuhauser, et al.
Target Audience:
Researchers, clinicians, and institutions in genomics and cancer research
Period of validity:
Not specified
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of Changes:
Not specified
Contextual description:
Supplementary information for a genomic and histological image repository enabling deep learning analysis in cancer research.