№ files_lp_4_process_3_090999
File format: docx
Character count: 3791
File size: 93 KB
Standardized application form used for candidates applying to specific roles at the Centre for Sustainable Healthcare, including sections for personal details, supporting statements, certifications, references, and equality monitoring.
Year:
2026
Organization:
Centre for Sustainable Healthcare
Document Type:
Job application form
Positions:
Nature Recovery Ranger, Senior Nature Recovery Ranger
Locations:
Manchester, Tameside, Glossop and Stockport, Bradford, London
Applicant Information Included:
Yes
Required Attachments:
CV, Supporting Statement, Certifications, Training Courses, Licenses, References
Equal Opportunity Statement:
Included
Submission Method:
Email
Relevant Legislation:
Equality Act 2010
Data Handling:
Confidential
Price: 8 / 10 USD
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
Don’t have cryptocurrency yet?
You can still complete your purchase in a few minutes:- Buy Crypto in a trusted app (Coinbase, Kraken, Cash App or any similar service).
- In the app, tap Send.
- Select network, paste our wallet address.
- Send the exact amount shown above.
The final amount may vary slightly depending on the payment method.
The file will be sent to the email address provided at checkout within 24 hours.
The product description is provided for reference. Actual content and formatting may differ slightly.
Year:
2082/83
Region / city:
Bardiya National Park
Topic:
Solar Power System Installation
Document Type:
Technical Specifications
Organization:
LI-BIRD
Author:
Not specified
Target Audience:
Suppliers, contractors, vendors
Period of Action:
Not specified
Approval Date:
Not specified
Modification Date:
Not specified
Year:
2021
Region / City:
Honey Grove, PA
Theme:
Youth Training Camps
Document Type:
Registration Form
Organization / Institution:
PennDel Network Royal Rangers
Author:
Christopher Vincent
Target Audience:
Boys, Parents, Group Leaders
Period of Validity:
August 4-7, 2021
Approval Date:
Not specified
Modification Date:
Not specified
Note:
Year
Document Type:
Job Description
Organization / Institution:
Yorkshire Dales National Park Authority
Year:
2016
Region / city:
Orleans Ranger District, Northern California
Theme:
Fire management, forest health
Document type:
Report
Organization / institution:
Six Rivers National Forest, U.S. Forest Service
Author:
Jake Shuler
Target audience:
Forestland managers, researchers, public
Period of validity:
1958-2015
Date of approval:
26th April 2016
Date of modifications:
None
Year:
2024
Region / City:
Edinburg
Topic:
Job Description, Parks and Recreation
Document Type:
Job Description
Organization:
City of Edinburg
Author:
Not specified
Target Audience:
Potential job applicants
Period of Validity:
Effective from 03/19/2024
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of Changes:
Not specified
Year:
2024
Region / City:
Washington State
Subject:
Park Ranger Supervision
Document Type:
Job Classification Summary
Agency / Organization:
Local Government / Parks Department
Author:
Not specified
Target Audience:
Job applicants, HR professionals
Period of Effectiveness:
Not specified
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of Changes:
05/2024
Role:
Ranger, Glencoe National Nature Reserve
Region:
Highlands and Islands
Reports to:
Senior Ranger, Glencoe NNR
Pay Band:
Grade 3 Lower, £25,603 - £27,318 pro-rata, per annum
Location:
NTS Glencoe National Nature Reserve, The Visitor Centre, Glencoe, PH49 4HX
Type of Contract:
Permanent, 40 hours a week
Organisation:
National Trust for Scotland
Department:
Ranger Service
Application Deadline:
Sunday 11th June 2023
Contact Email:
[email protected]
Required Qualifications:
Graduate level qualifications or equivalent experience in countryside management, nature conservation or environmental studies
Driving Licence:
Full clean UK driving license
Disclosure Requirement:
Disclosure Scotland checking required
Year:
2023
Region / City:
Florida
Theme:
State Parks
Document Type:
List
Agency / Organization:
Florida State Parks
Target Audience:
Visitors to Florida State Parks
Effective Date:
2023
Date of Approval:
Not specified
Date of Changes:
Not specified
Year:
2023
Region / city:
Mar Lodge Estate
Topic:
Nature conservation, visitor services, community engagement
Document type:
Job description
Organization / institution:
National Trust for Scotland
Author:
National Trust for Scotland
Target audience:
Job applicants
Period of validity:
Fixed term until October 2023
Approval date:
17th February 2023
Date of amendments:
N/A
Year:
2023
Region / City:
Cowpens National Battlefield
Topic:
Junior Ranger Program, Education
Document Type:
Program Guide
Organization:
National Park Service
Author:
National Park Service
Target Audience:
Children (6-10 years old), Parents
Duration:
Ongoing
Approval Date:
Not specified
Amendment Date:
Not specified
Year:
2019
Region / City:
United States
Topic:
Trailer Wiring
Document Type:
Instruction Manual
Organization / Institution:
None
Author:
Anonymous
Target Audience:
Ford Ranger Owners
Period of Validity:
Not specified
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of Changes:
Not specified
Year:
2025
Region / City:
Pine Creek / Lewin Springs, Northern Territory, Australia
Theme:
Land and freshwater management, Indigenous ranger programs
Document Type:
Position Description
Organization:
Northern Land Council
Author:
Human Resources Department, Northern Land Council
Target Audience:
Applicants for Ranger Coordinator position
Classification Level:
Administration Service Officer 6 (ASO6)
Reports To:
Regional Program Coordinator, Victoria River District
Direct Reports:
Wagiman Ranger Group
Special Measures:
Priority consideration for Aboriginal and/or Torres Strait Islander applicants
Location:
Pine Creek / Lewin Springs Ranger Base
Period of Responsibility:
2025–2030 (aligned with Wagiman Healthy Country Plan 2024–2034)
Date Approved:
September 2025
Key Functions:
Leadership, Stakeholder Relationships, Unit Operations, People Management, Work Health and Safety
Qualifications:
Minimum Certificate IV in Conservation and Ecosystem Management or equivalent, 2+ years relevant experience
Contextual Description:
Position description detailing responsibilities, reporting structure, and operational expectations for leading the Wagiman Ranger Group in land and freshwater management programs, including integration of Traditional Owner knowledge and compliance with WH&S standards.
Year:
2025
Region:
Australia
Program:
Indigenous Ranger Program Expansion
Document Type:
Q&A guidance for grant reporting
Organization:
National Indigenous Australians Agency (NIAA)
Audience:
Indigenous Ranger Program participants and grant recipients
Reports Covered:
IAS Online Performance Report, Annual Project Plan & Budget (APP&B) Report
Submission Deadline:
31 July 2025
Asset Approval Threshold:
AUD 5,000 (GST excl)
Privacy Compliance:
Privacy Act 1998, Australian Privacy Principles
Format:
Email correspondence and guidance notes
Year:
2013
Region / City:
Colorado River Basin, Western United States
Theme:
River Management, Water Conservation, Economic Impact, Recreation
Document Type:
Event Agenda
Organization:
River Management Society
Authors:
Various speakers, including experts in river management and conservation
Target Audience:
River managers, conservationists, water rights specialists, and stakeholders in river management
Period of Validity:
September 9-14, 2013
Approval Date:
Not specified
Modification Date:
Not specified
Year:
Not specified
Region / State:
South Carolina
Location:
Table Rock State Park
Subject:
Building roof replacement and construction bid requirements
Document Type:
Public works bid specification
Responsible Organization:
Table Rock State Park
Related Program:
Civilian Conservation Corps historic structure maintenance
Object of Work:
TR-1 Ranger Residence
Historic Status:
Building listed on the National Historic Register
Existing Roof Type:
Asphalt shingle roof
Required Roofing System:
30-year Timberline or equivalent architectural shingle system
Shingle Color Requirement:
Barkwood
Scope of Work:
Removal of existing roofing layers, inspection and replacement of roof decking, installation of underlayment, flashing, leak barriers, ridge vent shingles, and disposal of materials
Additional Requirements:
Magnetized cleanup for nails and compliance with manufacturer installation specifications
Bid Components Required:
Material cost, roof decking replacement cost beyond included quantity, waste disposal cost, labor cost, and total bid price
Supporting Materials:
Installation diagram referenced for roofing system guidelines
Year:
Not specified
Region / City:
Baytown, Texas
Topic:
Volunteer program, Bird watching
Document type:
Volunteer Handbook
Organization:
Baytown Nature Center
Author:
Not specified
Target audience:
Volunteers for Bird Buddies program
Period of validity:
Not specified
Approval date:
Not specified
Date of changes:
Not specified
Year:
2025
Region / City:
Chilika Wildlife Division, Odisha
Subject:
Tender Invitation
Document Type:
Tender Notice
Organ / Institution:
Office of the Divisional Forest Officer, Chilika Wildlife Division
Author:
Divisional Forest Officer
Target Audience:
Contractors, Government Agencies, Suppliers
Validity Period:
2 months
Approval Date:
23rd December 2025
Modification Date:
3rd January 2026
Note:
Study Summary 1.1 Please provide a brief summary of the study in the table below. A complete description of the study with detailed information should be provided in the body of the protocol. For sections not applicable to the study, mark them as N/A. Study Title Study Design Primary Objective/Purpose Secondary Objective(s)/Purposes Research Intervention(s) ClinicalTrials.gov NCT # Study Population Sample Size Study Duration for individual subjects Study Specific Abbreviations/ Definitions
Background 3.1 Provide the scientific or scholarly background for, rationale for, and significance of the research based on the existing literature and how will it add to existing knowledge. :
this section should be limited to only information directly related to the research questions and objectives. Do not include your full dissertation proposal. 3.2 Describe any relevant preliminary data (e.g. pilot data).
Procedures Involved 5.1 Describe and explain the study design. 5.2 Please select the methods that will be employed in this study (select all that apply):
☐ Audio/Video Recording ☐ Psychophysiological Recording ☐ Behavioral Interventions ☐ Record Review - Educational ☐ Behavioral Observations and Experimentations ☐ Record Review - Employee ☐ Deception ☐ Record Review- Medical ☐ Focus Groups ☐ Record Review - Other ☐ Interviews ☐ Specimen Collection or Analysis ☐ Investigational Medical Device – (e.g. Medical Mobile Applications) ☐ Surveys and/or Questionnaires ☐Psychometric Testing ☐ Other Social-Behavioral Procedures Provide a description of all research procedures being performed and when they are performed. (Upload any surveys, questionnaires, interview scripts, focus group scripts, debriefing scripts, psychometric tests, stimulus materials, intervention manuals, and data collection forms on the Local Site Documents page in the IRB application.) 5.3 Describe the procedures or interventions that are going to be conducted as part of the research project, but that would have been conducted anyway, even if the research was not occurring (i.e. standard of care procedures, activities that would occur in a classroom). 5.4 Describe the procedures performed to lessen the probability or magnitude of risks of items selected in 5.2.5. 5 If accessing or collecting existing data, describe: The data that will be collected during the study (e.g. demographics, medical history, etc.). Attach the data capture sheet(s) on the Local Site Documents page in the IRB application. How the data will be obtained, including how you have the authority to access the data. The source or location of the data (e.g. USF Epic, TGH Epic, Hillsborough County School records, CANVAS records, publicly available databases, etc.). 5.6 If collecting and/or analyzing biological specimens, describe: How the biological specimens will be or have been collected. How the biological specimens will be stored. How long the biological specimens will be stored. How the biological specimens will be used. The laboratories that will be used. Whether the collected biological specimens will undergo genetic testing. If so, indicate if this study is part of a Genome Wide Association Study (GWAS) and whether the data will be forwarded to the NIH dbGaP. 5.7 If there are plans for long-term follow-up (once all research related procedures are complete), what data will be collected during this period.
Data and Specimen Storage for Future Research 6.1 If data or specimens will be banked for future research studies, describe where the data or specimens will be stored, how long it/they will b:
the process to request a release, approvals required for release, who can obtain data or specimens, and the data to be provided with specimens.
Year:
2023
Region:
Chilterns, England, United Kingdom
Subject:
Nature conservation and habitat restoration
Document type:
Strategic plan / guidance
Organization:
Natural England
Target audience:
Land managers, conservation organizations, local authorities, local communities
Key habitats:
Woodlands, chalk streams, wetlands, ponds, farmland
Geographical significance:
National Landscape designation
Objectives:
Nature recovery, species protection, habitat connectivity, monitoring and evaluation
Legislation framework:
Protected Landscape Targets and Outcomes Framework (PLTOF)
) and join the S1NET. For guides with in depth examinations of performance measure definitions, go to:
https://www.milsuite.mil/book/docs/DOC-129783
Table of Contents (Hyperlinks to Sections):
Developing ‘Significant Duties and Responsibilities’ OER Narratives: Notes, Rules, and Instructions OER Narrative Prohibited Techniques, Inconsistencies, No-Go’s: Negative Comment Rules Referred OERs Narrative Comment Examples Block a. APFT and HT/WT Block b. Overall Performance Block c. Character (to include SHARP comments) Block d. Presence Block e. Intellect Block f. Leads Block g. Develops Block h. Achieves Senior Rater Potential Senior Rater Narrative Examples Senior Rater Narrative Comment Examples (for potential, promotion, school, etc.) Successive Assignments Other SR Comments (explanations of anything unusual about OER) Effective Words for Evaluations JUNIOR OFFICER PLATE (DA FORM 67-10-1) NOTE: 2LTs who have NOT completed BOLC, will not receive an OER until they complete BOLC (AC and ARNG; USAR officers can receive an OER before completing BOLC). The FROM date will be their commissioning date. All time until their BOLC graduation will be NONRATED on their first OER. OER PROFILING: OERs: Rater and Senior Rater Profiles are CONSTRAINED, meaning Officers are only allowed to grant 49% of each rank they rate with either an “EXCELS” (as Rater) or “MOST QUALIFIED” (as Senior Rater). HOWEVER, if you have an immature profile, and have only just begun rating/senior rating Officers of a certain rank, you are allowed a ONE TIME option of giving one of the first two evaluations you make at a particular grade, an “EXCELS” (as Rater) or “MOST QUALIFIED” (as Senior Rater). OER (OER SUPPORT FORM) PART III: Developing ‘Significant Duties and Responsibilities’ (blocks a., b., and c.): Refer to DA PAM 611-21 (https://www.milsuite.mil/book/groups/smartbookdapam611-21
) and DA PAM 600-3 (Commissioned Officer Professional Development and Career Management), to assist in the development of PART III, block d. As a minimum, the duty description will include pr:
- Number of personnel supervised, - Amount of resources under the rated officer’s control, - Scope of responsibilities. 3) Descriptions must be clear and concise with emphasis on specific functions required. 4) Note conditions unique to the assignment; e.g. RA officers assigned to FT support duties with RC units or USAR officers assigned to RA units OER NARRATIVES: Notes, Rules, and Instructions Rater and Senior Rater Narratives: - Requires candor and courage; frank and accurate assessment. - Quantify officer’s value relative to peers and do so in concert with rater/senior rater box check. - Are short; tell a simple story about the quality of officer being evaluated. - Are interesting and compelling. - Are looked at by selection board members when they are looking for in-depth information about a rated officer’s performance and potential. - Numbers; 1-10, write them out (e.g. one, two, ten). 11 or higher, write the number; e.g. 11, 15, 105. Exception, when a 1-10 is WITH an 11 or higher; e.g. “5 tool kits with 20 tools each.” - Fashion the narrative to the officer; double check use of “he/his” vs. “she/hers.” - Awards: Awards and/or special recognition received during the rating period may be cited in evaluation comments (for example, “received the Humanitarian Service Medal” or “named the Instructor of the Year”). - Raters and SR CAN use the officer’s name in the narrative; e.g. “1LT Joe was ….” Rater and Rater Narratives: - Focus on PERFORMANCE; explaining what the rated officer did and how well he/she did it. - Focus on specifics to quantify and qualify performance. - Raters should advocate the rated officer to the SR. - When there is no SR (due to lack of qualifications), rater’s narrative provides the input on both performance and potential. Senior Rater (SR) and SR Narrative (see SR Rater Narrative section for examples): - Focus on POTENTIAL, 3-5 years out (promotions, command, school, & assignments). - Can amplify box checks by using the narrative to clearly send the appropriate message to selection boards. - CANNOT mention Box Check. - Additional information for when SR is also Rater can be found in DA PAM 623-3, pg. 26, “DA Form 67–10–1, part VI: block c—Senior Rater Narrative.” OER Narrative Prohibited Techniques, Inconsistencies, No-Go’s: - School/Course Comments: Bullets about how a Soldier did in a school or course are ONLY allowed if that school did not produce an AER/DA Form 1059. - Narratives are not a laundry list of superlatives – more is not necessarily better. - Brief, unqualified superlatives or phrases, particularly if they may be considered trite. - Excessive use of technical acronyms, or phrases not commonly recognized. - Techniques aimed at making specific words, phrases, or sentences stand out from the rest of the narrative; e.g. excessive use of capital letters; unnecessary quotation marks; repeated use of exclamation points; wide spacing between selected words, phrases, or sentences to include double spacing within a paragraph or between paragraphs. - Inappropriate references to box checks; e.g “Would be TOP BLOCK if profile allowed” or “absolutely far exceeded the standard”. - Trying to quantify (e.g. “top 2% of my captains”) with a small population. - Stay in your lane/level; avoid comments like “Best 1LT in the Army” unless you’re the Army CoS. - Stating “the best ever”; having 10 in the population, 50 in the profile. - Using overused phrases and clichés that are counterproductive or overused; e.g. stellar, historic, “delivered a dazzling performance,” “hit the ground running,” consummate professional, and unlimited potential. - Using specific selection board-type language. Examples of this include, “definitely a 6+ Soldier”. - Don’t exaggerate; “If I could prove it, CPT X is an LTC disguised as a CPT.” - Be mindful of what IS NOT said; it can have the same impact as what is said; e.g. NOT having numbers, or quantifiable points. - Don’t say the sa
Note:
en
Topic:
Officer Evaluation, Narrative Guidelines
Document Type:
Guide
Target Audience:
Raters, Senior Raters