№ lp_1_2_01153
File format: docx
Character count: 18078
File size: 650 KB
This document outlines the application process and requirements for obtaining an Improvement Location Permit (ILP) for construction and property modifications in Greencastle.
Year:
2002
Region / City:
Greencastle
Theme:
Zoning, Urban Planning
Document Type:
Permit Application
Organization:
City of Greencastle
Author:
Ratio Architects Inc.
Target Audience:
Property developers, contractors, and city planners
Validity Period:
Not specified
Approval Date:
Not specified
Amendment Date:
Not specified
Price: 8 / 10 USD
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
Don’t have cryptocurrency yet?
You can still complete your purchase in a few minutes:- Buy Crypto in a trusted app (Coinbase, Kraken, Cash App or any similar service).
- In the app, tap Send.
- Select network, paste our wallet address.
- Send the exact amount shown above.
The final amount may vary slightly depending on the payment method.
The file will be sent to the email address provided at checkout within 24 hours.
The product description is provided for reference. Actual content and formatting may differ slightly.
Year:
2024
Region / City:
N/A
Subject:
Policies and Procedures
Document Type:
Policy Chart
Institution:
N/A
Author:
N/A
Target Audience:
Faculty, Staff, Students, Program Directors, Clinical Education Coordinators
Period of Action:
November 2024
Approval Date:
N/A
Date of Modifications:
N/A
Note:
Year
Region / City:
Midland, Texas
Theme:
Oil & Gas Permit Application
Document Type:
Surface Location Acknowledgment Form
Agency / Organization:
City of Midland
Target Audience:
Surface Owners
Contextual Description:
A legal document confirming the acknowledgment of a proposed oil and gas well location and its operational details by a surface owner, outlining compensation, restoration, and operational conditions.
Year:
2026
Region / City:
Fresno, CA
Topic:
Job Vacancy
Document Type:
Announcement
Organization:
144 Fighter Wing
Author:
Not specified
Target Audience:
Current members of the 144 Fighter Wing
Period of Validity:
Until 19-Feb-2026
Approval Date:
29-Jan-2026
Modification Date:
Not specified
Position Title:
Information Technology Systems
AFSC:
1D771
Required Rank:
E6-E7
Position Number:
01126909
Area of Consideration:
Wing Only
ASVAB Required:
E60
Year:
2026
Region / City:
Fresno, CA
Subject:
Traffic Management
Document Type:
Vacancy Announcement
Organization / Institution:
California Air National Guard
Author:
Not specified
Target Audience:
Current members of the California Air National Guard
Period of validity:
Not specified
Approval Date:
Not specified
Amendment Date:
Not specified
Position Title:
Deputy Wing Commander
AFSC:
91W0/11MXC Preferred; Any AFSC Accepted
Required Rank:
O5(Promotable)–O6
Position Number:
109928534
Area of Consideration:
Nationwide
Control Grade Required:
Yes - The on-boarding of the selected candidate is contingent upon Control Grade (CG) availability.
Additional Notes:
COE preferred for Lt Col/O5 promotion-eligible applicants. Applicants should include COE with application package.
Year:
2026
Region / City:
Channel Islands, CA
Subject:
Military position announcement
Document Type:
Vacancy announcement
Institution / Organization:
California National Guard
Author:
California National Guard HR Department
Target Audience:
Active, Reserve, and Guard members of the United States Air Force and Space Force
Effective Period:
January 22, 2026 - February 22, 2026
Approval Date:
January 22, 2026
Modification Date:
N/A
Year:
2026
Region / City:
California
Theme:
Military Recruitment
Document Type:
Job Announcement
Organization / Institution:
California Air National Guard
Author:
California Air National Guard
Target Audience:
Members of the California Air National Guard
Period of Validity:
From 20-Jan-2026 to 10-Feb-2026
Approval Date:
20-Jan-2026
Modification Date:
N/A
Description:
Military job announcement for the position of Special Mission Aviator- HH-60 Flight Engineer in the California Air National Guard, with detailed application instructions and qualification requirements.
) and join the S1NET. For guides with in depth examinations of performance measure definitions, go to:
https://www.milsuite.mil/book/docs/DOC-129783
Table of Contents (Hyperlinks to Sections):
Developing ‘Significant Duties and Responsibilities’ OER Narratives: Notes, Rules, and Instructions OER Narrative Prohibited Techniques, Inconsistencies, No-Go’s: Negative Comment Rules Referred OERs Narrative Comment Examples Block a. APFT and HT/WT Block b. Overall Performance Block c. Character (to include SHARP comments) Block d. Presence Block e. Intellect Block f. Leads Block g. Develops Block h. Achieves Senior Rater Potential Senior Rater Narrative Examples Senior Rater Narrative Comment Examples (for potential, promotion, school, etc.) Successive Assignments Other SR Comments (explanations of anything unusual about OER) Effective Words for Evaluations JUNIOR OFFICER PLATE (DA FORM 67-10-1) NOTE: 2LTs who have NOT completed BOLC, will not receive an OER until they complete BOLC (AC and ARNG; USAR officers can receive an OER before completing BOLC). The FROM date will be their commissioning date. All time until their BOLC graduation will be NONRATED on their first OER. OER PROFILING: OERs: Rater and Senior Rater Profiles are CONSTRAINED, meaning Officers are only allowed to grant 49% of each rank they rate with either an “EXCELS” (as Rater) or “MOST QUALIFIED” (as Senior Rater). HOWEVER, if you have an immature profile, and have only just begun rating/senior rating Officers of a certain rank, you are allowed a ONE TIME option of giving one of the first two evaluations you make at a particular grade, an “EXCELS” (as Rater) or “MOST QUALIFIED” (as Senior Rater). OER (OER SUPPORT FORM) PART III: Developing ‘Significant Duties and Responsibilities’ (blocks a., b., and c.): Refer to DA PAM 611-21 (https://www.milsuite.mil/book/groups/smartbookdapam611-21
) and DA PAM 600-3 (Commissioned Officer Professional Development and Career Management), to assist in the development of PART III, block d. As a minimum, the duty description will include pr:
- Number of personnel supervised, - Amount of resources under the rated officer’s control, - Scope of responsibilities. 3) Descriptions must be clear and concise with emphasis on specific functions required. 4) Note conditions unique to the assignment; e.g. RA officers assigned to FT support duties with RC units or USAR officers assigned to RA units OER NARRATIVES: Notes, Rules, and Instructions Rater and Senior Rater Narratives: - Requires candor and courage; frank and accurate assessment. - Quantify officer’s value relative to peers and do so in concert with rater/senior rater box check. - Are short; tell a simple story about the quality of officer being evaluated. - Are interesting and compelling. - Are looked at by selection board members when they are looking for in-depth information about a rated officer’s performance and potential. - Numbers; 1-10, write them out (e.g. one, two, ten). 11 or higher, write the number; e.g. 11, 15, 105. Exception, when a 1-10 is WITH an 11 or higher; e.g. “5 tool kits with 20 tools each.” - Fashion the narrative to the officer; double check use of “he/his” vs. “she/hers.” - Awards: Awards and/or special recognition received during the rating period may be cited in evaluation comments (for example, “received the Humanitarian Service Medal” or “named the Instructor of the Year”). - Raters and SR CAN use the officer’s name in the narrative; e.g. “1LT Joe was ….” Rater and Rater Narratives: - Focus on PERFORMANCE; explaining what the rated officer did and how well he/she did it. - Focus on specifics to quantify and qualify performance. - Raters should advocate the rated officer to the SR. - When there is no SR (due to lack of qualifications), rater’s narrative provides the input on both performance and potential. Senior Rater (SR) and SR Narrative (see SR Rater Narrative section for examples): - Focus on POTENTIAL, 3-5 years out (promotions, command, school, & assignments). - Can amplify box checks by using the narrative to clearly send the appropriate message to selection boards. - CANNOT mention Box Check. - Additional information for when SR is also Rater can be found in DA PAM 623-3, pg. 26, “DA Form 67–10–1, part VI: block c—Senior Rater Narrative.” OER Narrative Prohibited Techniques, Inconsistencies, No-Go’s: - School/Course Comments: Bullets about how a Soldier did in a school or course are ONLY allowed if that school did not produce an AER/DA Form 1059. - Narratives are not a laundry list of superlatives – more is not necessarily better. - Brief, unqualified superlatives or phrases, particularly if they may be considered trite. - Excessive use of technical acronyms, or phrases not commonly recognized. - Techniques aimed at making specific words, phrases, or sentences stand out from the rest of the narrative; e.g. excessive use of capital letters; unnecessary quotation marks; repeated use of exclamation points; wide spacing between selected words, phrases, or sentences to include double spacing within a paragraph or between paragraphs. - Inappropriate references to box checks; e.g “Would be TOP BLOCK if profile allowed” or “absolutely far exceeded the standard”. - Trying to quantify (e.g. “top 2% of my captains”) with a small population. - Stay in your lane/level; avoid comments like “Best 1LT in the Army” unless you’re the Army CoS. - Stating “the best ever”; having 10 in the population, 50 in the profile. - Using overused phrases and clichés that are counterproductive or overused; e.g. stellar, historic, “delivered a dazzling performance,” “hit the ground running,” consummate professional, and unlimited potential. - Using specific selection board-type language. Examples of this include, “definitely a 6+ Soldier”. - Don’t exaggerate; “If I could prove it, CPT X is an LTC disguised as a CPT.” - Be mindful of what IS NOT said; it can have the same impact as what is said; e.g. NOT having numbers, or quantifiable points. - Don’t say the sa
Note:
en
Topic:
Officer Evaluation, Narrative Guidelines
Document Type:
Guide
Target Audience:
Raters, Senior Raters
Year of issue:
2012–2019
Organization:
Joint Rig Committee
Document type:
Code of Practice / Scope of Work / Certificate Requirements
Region:
International offshore operations
Target audience:
Marine Warranty Surveyors, underwriters, project assurance teams
Version:
1–3
Date of issue:
27 January 2012, 20 December 2016, 03 September 2019
Changes:
Original; Update to COP & SOW and introduction of JR2012A; Update to COP & SOW
Approval requirements:
Marine Warranty Surveyor certification, compliance with COP and SOW
Operations covered:
Rig location, rig move, marine operations, equipment suitability
Confidentiality and conflict of interest considerations:
Included
Note:
Year
Context:
Document is a technical specification template for quality control and mix testing in asphalt paving projects.
Note:
Year
Region / City:
Phoenix, AZ
Topic:
Shipping and Return Instructions for Medical Kits
Document Type:
Instructional
Organization / Institution:
MedAire
Target Audience:
Customers of MedAire
Year:
2022
Event:
3GPP TSG-RAN WG2 Meeting #118
Location:
Online
Topic:
Coarse UE location information format and reporting mechanism
Document type:
Meeting report / technical discussion
Organization:
3GPP
Author:
Thales
Agenda item:
6.10.1.1
Deadline for feedback:
2022-05-19 08:00 UTC
Deadline for rapporteur summary:
2022-05-19 10:00 UTC
Proposals for agreement by session chair:
2022-05-19 20:00 UTC
Year:
2011
Region / City:
United States
Topic:
Real Time Location Systems (RTLS) Implementation
Document Type:
Performance Work Statement (PWS)
Organization:
Department of Veterans Affairs
Author:
Not specified
Target Audience:
Contractors, Project Managers, IT Professionals, Veterans Affairs Personnel
Period of Action:
Not specified
Approval Date:
November 17, 2011
Modification Date:
December 9, 2011
Year:
2014
Region / City:
Fredericksburg, VA
Subject:
GIS Location Services for VA National Cemeteries
Document Type:
Sources Sought Notice
Agency / Institution:
U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs
Author:
Glenn Burton
Target Audience:
Vendors capable of providing GIS Location Services
Effective Period:
Not specified
Approval Date:
Not specified
Amendment Date:
Not specified
Contracting Officer:
Glenn Burton
Description:
Request for information (RFI) regarding GIS Location Services for the VA National Cemetery Administration.
Keywords:
GIS, Location Services, GPS, Veterans Affairs, National Cemeteries, Burial Operations
Place of Performance:
U.S. National Cemeteries
Year:
Not specified
Region / City:
Wisconsin
Subject:
Construction specifications for clay liners in wet detention ponds
Document Type:
Special Provision
Author:
Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources
Target Audience:
Geotechnical Engineers, Contractors
Period of validity:
Not specified
Approval Date:
Not specified
Amendment Date:
Not specified
Year:
2017
Region / City:
National Cemetery Administration
Topic:
Executive Core Qualification (ECQ) coaching for SES certification
Document Type:
Statement of Work
Organization / Institution:
National Cemetery Administration (NCA)
Author:
National Cemetery Administration
Target Audience:
Senior General Schedule employees, SES candidates
Period of Implementation:
Date of Award through September 30, 2017 (Base Period); October 1, 2017 - September 30, 2018 (Option Year One)
Approval Date:
Date of Award
Modification Date:
None
Year:
2020
Region / City:
Clark County, Boulder City
Subject:
Engineering, Construction, Water Systems, Wastewater, Utilities
Document Type:
Guidelines, Standards
Organization / Institution:
Southern Nevada Health District, Regional Transportation Commission of Southern Nevada, Boulder City
Author:
Nevada Blue Book, Clark County
Target Audience:
Engineers, Architects, Developers
Effective Period:
2020
Approval Date:
2020
Amendment Date:
Not specified
Year:
2004
Region / City:
USA
Subject:
Healthcare, Medical Software, Procedures
Document Type:
Technical Manual
Organization / Institution:
Department of Veterans Affairs
Author:
REDACTED
Target Audience:
Medical Professionals, IT Staff
Period of Validity:
Ongoing
Approval Date:
April 2004
Date of Changes:
December 2018
Year:
2024-2027
Region / City:
United States
Topic:
Education Data Collection
Document Type:
Communication Package
Organ / Institution:
National Center for Education Statistics (NCES), U.S. Department of Education
Author:
National Center for Education Statistics (NCES)
Target Audience:
Educational institutions, CEOs, Keyholders, Coordinators
Period of Activity:
2024-2027
Approval Date:
February 2024
Amendment Dates:
May 2025, October 2025, December 2025