№ lp_1_2_39957
File format: docx
Character count: 45010
File size: 176 KB
This document is a standard bidding document designed to guide the procurement process for public works in Mauritius, specifically for projects up to Rs 30 million under the Open National Bidding method.
Year:
2024
Region / city:
Port Louis
Theme:
Procurement of Works
Document Type:
Standard Bidding Document
Organization / Institution:
Procurement Policy Office, Ministry of Finance, Economic Planning and Development
Author:
Procurement Policy Office
Target Audience:
Contractors, Public Bodies
Period of Validity:
90 days from submission deadline
Approval Date:
April 2024
Date of Modifications:
Not specified
Price: 8 / 10 USD
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
Don’t have cryptocurrency yet?
You can still complete your purchase in a few minutes:- Buy Crypto in a trusted app (Coinbase, Kraken, Cash App or any similar service).
- In the app, tap Send.
- Select network, paste our wallet address.
- Send the exact amount shown above.
The final amount may vary slightly depending on the payment method.
The file will be sent to the email address provided at checkout within 24 hours.
The product description is provided for reference. Actual content and formatting may differ slightly.
Year:
Not specified
Region / city:
Not specified
Topic:
IT Configuration, Networking
Document Type:
Instructional Guide
Author:
Not specified
Target Audience:
IT professionals, Network administrators
Period of validity:
Not specified
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of changes:
Not specified
Contextual description:
A technical guide explaining how to modify default values for plink.exe used by iMC on Windows systems by configuring Putty and exporting settings to the iMC server.
Note:
Course Number and Title
Year:
2014
Region / City:
-
Topic:
Address validation process for service address
Document type:
Technical specification
Organization / Institution:
-
Author:
-
Target audience:
Technical professionals involved in address validation systems
Period of validity:
-
Approval date:
-
Date of changes:
-
Year:
2024
Region / city:
International
Topic:
Safety transport of radioactive materials
Document type:
Report
Organization / institution:
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
Author:
IAEA Secretariat
Target audience:
IAEA members, safety committees, regulators
Period of validity:
Not specified
Date of approval:
Not specified
Date of amendments:
Not specified
Course:
PHIL 2050
Year:
2018-2019
Region / City:
Utah Valley University
Subject:
Ethics and Philosophy
Document Type:
Course Syllabus
Institution:
Utah Valley University
Instructor:
Not specified
Target Audience:
High school seniors and college students
Prerequisites:
High school senior status, completion of English 1010 or equivalent
Period of Validity:
2018-2019
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of Changes:
Not specified
Year:
2018
Region / city:
European Union
Topic:
Vehicle type authorisation, ERATV parameters
Document type:
Form
Organization / institution:
European Union Agency for Railways (ERA)
Author:
European Union Agency for Railways
Target audience:
Applicants for vehicle type authorisation, conformity assessment bodies
Period of validity:
Not specified
Approval date:
Not specified
Date of amendments:
Not specified
Year:
2020
Region / city:
Elbonia
Topic:
Network Protocols, 5G
Document Type:
Change Request
Organization:
3GPP
Author:
TNO
Target Audience:
5G Network Engineers, Standardization Bodies
Period of validity:
Not specified
Approval Date:
2020-07-16
Amendment Date:
Not specified
Year:
2012
Region / City:
Ontario, Canada
Topic:
Generational Differences in the Workplace
Document Type:
Case Study
Organization:
Richard Ivey School of Business Foundation
Author:
Chris Higgins
Target Audience:
Business professionals, human resources experts
Period of Validity:
2012
Approval Date:
2012-08-14
Modification Date:
N/A
Year:
2018
Region / City:
European Union
Topic:
Vehicle Type Authorisation
Document Type:
Regulation
Issuing Body:
European Union Agency for Railways
Author:
European Union Agency for Railways
Target Audience:
Applicants for Vehicle Type Authorisation, Conformity Assessment Bodies (NoBo, DeBo)
Validity Period:
Indefinite
Approval Date:
Not specified
Amendment Date:
Not specified
Year:
2018
Region / city:
Bangladesh
Theme:
Procurement
Document Type:
Tender Document
Organization:
Central Procurement Technical Unit, Implementation Monitoring and Evaluation Division, Ministry of Planning
Author:
Not specified
Target Audience:
Procuring Entities and Tenderers
Period of Validity:
Not specified
Approval Date:
September 2018
Amendments:
Not specified
Note:
Year
Theme:
Healthcare, Abortion Care
Document Type:
Workshop Guide
Organization / Institution:
Reproductive Health Access Project
Author:
Jini Tanenhaus, Vicki Breitbart, Lisa Maldonado, Laura Riker, Judy Lipshutz, Nancy Morisseau
Target Audience:
Healthcare providers, trainers, policymakers, interdisciplinary staff
Year:
2025
Region / City:
Global
Topic:
Antenna Performance, Mobile Devices
Document Type:
Industry Specification
Organization:
GSM Association
Author:
GSM Association
Target Audience:
Operators, Manufacturers, Industry Experts
Period of Validity:
Not specified
Approval Date:
October 2025
Date of Changes:
Not specified
Year:
2014–2013
Region:
Wales
Topic:
Health and social care practice
Document type:
Training and learning framework section
Sector:
Health and social care
Legal framework:
Social Services and Well-Being (Wales) Act 2014; Equality Act 2010; Human Rights Act 1998; Mental Capacity Act 2005; Mental Health Act; Welsh Language legislation
Codes and standards:
Code of Conduct for Healthcare Support Workers; Code of Professional Practice for Social Care
Target audience:
Health and social care workers (adults)
Key approaches:
Rights based approaches; person centred practice; equality, diversity and inclusion; positive risk taking; relationship centred working
Assessment elements:
Learning outcomes; evidence requirements; assessment and signatures
Note:
Year
Institution / organization:
North Dakota State University
Year:
2024
Note:
Region / City
Theme:
Community Care, Jewish Values
Document Type:
Statement of Values
Organization:
CJC Caring Cooperative
Target Audience:
CJC Members
) and join the S1NET. For guides with in depth examinations of performance measure definitions, go to:
https://www.milsuite.mil/book/docs/DOC-129783
Table of Contents (Hyperlinks to Sections):
Developing ‘Significant Duties and Responsibilities’ OER Narratives: Notes, Rules, and Instructions OER Narrative Prohibited Techniques, Inconsistencies, No-Go’s: Negative Comment Rules Referred OERs Narrative Comment Examples Block a. APFT and HT/WT Block b. Overall Performance Block c. Character (to include SHARP comments) Block d. Presence Block e. Intellect Block f. Leads Block g. Develops Block h. Achieves Senior Rater Potential Senior Rater Narrative Examples Senior Rater Narrative Comment Examples (for potential, promotion, school, etc.) Successive Assignments Other SR Comments (explanations of anything unusual about OER) Effective Words for Evaluations JUNIOR OFFICER PLATE (DA FORM 67-10-1) NOTE: 2LTs who have NOT completed BOLC, will not receive an OER until they complete BOLC (AC and ARNG; USAR officers can receive an OER before completing BOLC). The FROM date will be their commissioning date. All time until their BOLC graduation will be NONRATED on their first OER. OER PROFILING: OERs: Rater and Senior Rater Profiles are CONSTRAINED, meaning Officers are only allowed to grant 49% of each rank they rate with either an “EXCELS” (as Rater) or “MOST QUALIFIED” (as Senior Rater). HOWEVER, if you have an immature profile, and have only just begun rating/senior rating Officers of a certain rank, you are allowed a ONE TIME option of giving one of the first two evaluations you make at a particular grade, an “EXCELS” (as Rater) or “MOST QUALIFIED” (as Senior Rater). OER (OER SUPPORT FORM) PART III: Developing ‘Significant Duties and Responsibilities’ (blocks a., b., and c.): Refer to DA PAM 611-21 (https://www.milsuite.mil/book/groups/smartbookdapam611-21
) and DA PAM 600-3 (Commissioned Officer Professional Development and Career Management), to assist in the development of PART III, block d. As a minimum, the duty description will include pr:
- Number of personnel supervised, - Amount of resources under the rated officer’s control, - Scope of responsibilities. 3) Descriptions must be clear and concise with emphasis on specific functions required. 4) Note conditions unique to the assignment; e.g. RA officers assigned to FT support duties with RC units or USAR officers assigned to RA units OER NARRATIVES: Notes, Rules, and Instructions Rater and Senior Rater Narratives: - Requires candor and courage; frank and accurate assessment. - Quantify officer’s value relative to peers and do so in concert with rater/senior rater box check. - Are short; tell a simple story about the quality of officer being evaluated. - Are interesting and compelling. - Are looked at by selection board members when they are looking for in-depth information about a rated officer’s performance and potential. - Numbers; 1-10, write them out (e.g. one, two, ten). 11 or higher, write the number; e.g. 11, 15, 105. Exception, when a 1-10 is WITH an 11 or higher; e.g. “5 tool kits with 20 tools each.” - Fashion the narrative to the officer; double check use of “he/his” vs. “she/hers.” - Awards: Awards and/or special recognition received during the rating period may be cited in evaluation comments (for example, “received the Humanitarian Service Medal” or “named the Instructor of the Year”). - Raters and SR CAN use the officer’s name in the narrative; e.g. “1LT Joe was ….” Rater and Rater Narratives: - Focus on PERFORMANCE; explaining what the rated officer did and how well he/she did it. - Focus on specifics to quantify and qualify performance. - Raters should advocate the rated officer to the SR. - When there is no SR (due to lack of qualifications), rater’s narrative provides the input on both performance and potential. Senior Rater (SR) and SR Narrative (see SR Rater Narrative section for examples): - Focus on POTENTIAL, 3-5 years out (promotions, command, school, & assignments). - Can amplify box checks by using the narrative to clearly send the appropriate message to selection boards. - CANNOT mention Box Check. - Additional information for when SR is also Rater can be found in DA PAM 623-3, pg. 26, “DA Form 67–10–1, part VI: block c—Senior Rater Narrative.” OER Narrative Prohibited Techniques, Inconsistencies, No-Go’s: - School/Course Comments: Bullets about how a Soldier did in a school or course are ONLY allowed if that school did not produce an AER/DA Form 1059. - Narratives are not a laundry list of superlatives – more is not necessarily better. - Brief, unqualified superlatives or phrases, particularly if they may be considered trite. - Excessive use of technical acronyms, or phrases not commonly recognized. - Techniques aimed at making specific words, phrases, or sentences stand out from the rest of the narrative; e.g. excessive use of capital letters; unnecessary quotation marks; repeated use of exclamation points; wide spacing between selected words, phrases, or sentences to include double spacing within a paragraph or between paragraphs. - Inappropriate references to box checks; e.g “Would be TOP BLOCK if profile allowed” or “absolutely far exceeded the standard”. - Trying to quantify (e.g. “top 2% of my captains”) with a small population. - Stay in your lane/level; avoid comments like “Best 1LT in the Army” unless you’re the Army CoS. - Stating “the best ever”; having 10 in the population, 50 in the profile. - Using overused phrases and clichés that are counterproductive or overused; e.g. stellar, historic, “delivered a dazzling performance,” “hit the ground running,” consummate professional, and unlimited potential. - Using specific selection board-type language. Examples of this include, “definitely a 6+ Soldier”. - Don’t exaggerate; “If I could prove it, CPT X is an LTC disguised as a CPT.” - Be mindful of what IS NOT said; it can have the same impact as what is said; e.g. NOT having numbers, or quantifiable points. - Don’t say the sa
Note:
en
Topic:
Officer Evaluation, Narrative Guidelines
Document Type:
Guide
Target Audience:
Raters, Senior Raters
Note:
and the site visit team chair eight (8) weeks prior to the site visit)(4.2024)
Year:
2024
Region / City:
N/A
Theme:
Accreditation
Document Type:
Schedule Template
Organization / Institution:
ARC-PA
Author:
N/A
Target Audience:
Program administrators, Site visit team
Period of Validity:
N/A
Approval Date:
N/A
Modification Date:
N/A
Year:
2022
Organizations:
Peninsula Clean Energy (PCE), Silicon Valley Clean Energy (SVCE), East Bay Community Energy (EBCE)
Document Type:
Code Amendment Recommendations
Scope:
Residential and Nonresidential EV Charging Requirements
Version Dates:
May 11, 2022; July 8, 2022; September 2022; October 2022
Target Audience:
Local jurisdictions and code administrators
Reference:
2022 Title 24 Part 11 California Green Building Standards Code (CALGreen)
Topics:
EV Charging Stations, EV Ready Spaces, Direct Current Fast Charging, Automatic Load Management Systems, Multifamily and Nonresidential Buildings
URL:
BayAreaReachCodes.Org
Year:
2022
Region / city:
California
Theme:
Water Quality, Environmental Assessment
Document Type:
Technical Report
Organization / Institution:
Caltrans
Author:
Not specified
Target Audience:
Environmental regulators, project managers
Period of validity:
Not specified
Approval Date:
Not specified
Modification Date:
Not specified
Year:
2021
Region / City:
Idaho
Topic:
Conservation, Big Game Species
Document Type:
Guideline
Agency:
Bureau of Land Management (BLM), Idaho Department of Fish and Game (IDFG)
Author:
Bureau of Land Management (BLM)
Target Audience:
Wildlife managers, conservationists, land management authorities
Effective Period:
Ongoing
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of Changes:
Not specified