№ lp_1_2_29661
File format: docx
Character count: 6487
File size: 128 KB
This document provides a detailed submission form for organizations entering the Best Competencies and Skill Development category of the HCM Excellence Awards, outlining the process of creating and implementing a workplace development program.
Note:
Year
Topic:
Learning & Development, Competency and Skill Development
Document Type:
Entry Form
Organization / Institution:
Brandon Hall Group
Target Audience:
HR professionals, Learning and Development teams
Price: 8 / 10 USD
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
Don’t have cryptocurrency yet?
You can still complete your purchase in a few minutes:- Buy Crypto in a trusted app (Coinbase, Kraken, Cash App or any similar service).
- In the app, tap Send.
- Select network, paste our wallet address.
- Send the exact amount shown above.
The final amount may vary slightly depending on the payment method.
The file will be sent to the email address provided at checkout within 24 hours.
The product description is provided for reference. Actual content and formatting may differ slightly.
Note:
Year
Topic:
Prehospital medical skills
Document type:
Documentation table
Target audience:
EMTs, paramedics
Context:
The document provides detailed guidelines for tracking and documenting successful completion of essential prehospital medical skills.
Year:
2024
Region / City:
Guwahati
Topic:
Procurement of Equipment for Survey Lab
Document Type:
Invitation for Bids
Organ / Institution:
Assam Skill University Project
Author:
Md. Hanif Noorani, CEO, Assam Skill University Project cum Registrar, Assam Skill University
Target Audience:
Eligible Bidders from ADB source countries
Period of Validity:
Until 9 December 2024
Approval Date:
9 November 2024
Date of Changes:
N/A
Year:
2023
Region / City:
Southern Africa
Topic:
Project Management
Document Type:
Assignment Guide
Organization / Institution:
Institute of Business Management of Southern Africa
Author:
Institute of Business Management of Southern Africa
Target Audience:
Learners of the Project Management Program
Period of Validity:
Not specified
Approval Date:
Not specified
Modification Date:
Not specified
Year:
2022
Region / City:
Himachal Pradesh, India
Subject:
Skill Gap Study
Document Type:
Request for Proposal (RFP)
Issuing Organization:
Himachal Pradesh State Rural Livelihood Mission (HPSRLM), Department of Rural Development
Contact Information:
Khalini, Shimla-171002; Phone: 0177-2970081/82; Email: [email protected]
Assignment Duration:
3 months
Submission Deadline:
22/08/2022, 4:00 PM
Issuance Date:
30/07/2022
Eligibility Criteria:
Agencies registered in India with minimum 2 years of operation and positive net worth in last three financial years
Bid Evaluation:
Financial bid selection; technical bid for qualification only
Earnest Money Deposit:
INR 1,00,000
Tender Notice No:
TN. No:2 / TTD-Dr YSRHU/CRS-TPT 2022-23
Date of Commencement of DOWNLOADING OF THE BID DOCUMENT:
29.07.2022 AT 4.00 PM
Last date for receipt of bids:
06.08.2022 AT 2.00 PM
Time and date of opening of Technical and Price bid:
06.08.2022 AT 2.30 PM
Address for Communication:
THE PRINCIPAL SCIENTIST (HORT.) & HEAD, CITRUS RESEARCH STATION, TIRUPATI – 517 502, TIRUPATI DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH
Year:
2022-23
Region / City:
Tirupati, Andhra Pradesh
Theme:
Supply and framing of printed images
Document Type:
Tender
Organization / Institution:
Dr. Y. S. R. Horticultural University, Citrus Research Station
Author:
Dr. Y. S. R. Horticultural University
Target Audience:
Bidders, manufacturers, and authorized representatives
Period of Validity:
N/A
Approval Date:
N/A
Amendment Date:
N/A
Year:
2026
Region:
United States
Subject:
Family engagement and care planning
Document type:
Training guide / instructional manual
Organization:
Wraparound Program / Family Support Services
Target audience:
Family partners, care coordinators
Core principles:
SE, S, W, DS, FVC
Activities:
Engage the Family, Work with Caregiver, Gather Information (SNCD), Agenda Preparation, Care Planning
Skills emphasized:
Active listening, cultural respect, family strengths identification, natural support engagement, documentation use
Year:
2015
Region / City:
Haymarket
Topic:
Hockey Skill Rankings
Document Type:
Player Evaluation Guideline
Organization / Institution:
Haymarket Hockey League
Author:
Haymarket Hockey League Advisory Board
Target Audience:
Players of Haymarket Hockey League
Effective Period:
Summer 2015 Season and beyond
Approval Date:
Summer 2015
Revision Date:
N/A
Note:
Year
Theme:
Self-management
Document Type:
Skill Development Checklist
Year:
N/A
Region / City:
Florida
Theme:
Firefighting Training
Document Type:
Retention Skill Assessment Worksheet
Organization / Institution:
Division of State Fire Marshal, Bureau of Fire Standards and Training
Author:
N/A
Target Audience:
Firefighter recruits, instructors, training facilities
Period of Validity:
N/A
Approval Date:
N/A
Date of Changes:
N/A
Year:
2026
Region / City:
Rajasthan
Subject:
Skill Development
Document Type:
Expression of Interest (EOI)
Organization:
Rajasthan Skill and Livelihoods Development Corporation (RSLDC)
Author:
N/A
Target Audience:
Eligible national agencies, business houses, industry bodies, government institutions, PSUs, universities, colleges, ITIs, polytechnics, and other skill training providers
Period of Validity:
N/A
Approval Date:
22 January 2026
Amendment Date:
N/A
Note:
Description
Year:
2020
Region / City:
United States
Topic:
Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act (WIOA) Performance Measures
Document Type:
Regulatory Guidance
Institution:
Rehabilitation Services Administration (RSA)
Author:
Unknown
Target Audience:
Vocational Rehabilitation Counselors, Program Administrators
Period of Validity:
Not specified
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of Changes:
Not specified
Year:
2025
Region / City:
Global
Subject:
Research funding
Document Type:
Application form
Organization / Institution:
INQUA
Author:
INQUA Secretariat
Target Audience:
Researchers, Early Career Researchers, Developing Country Researchers, Principal Investigators, Co-Principal Investigators
Period of Validity:
Until September 30, 2025
Approval Date:
Not specified
Modification Date:
Not specified
Year:
2024
Region / city:
CNTW
Theme:
Safer staffing, workforce management
Document type:
Report
Organization / institution:
CNTW
Author:
Liz Hanley
Target audience:
Quality and Performance Committee, nursing and healthcare professionals
Period of validity:
October 2024
Approval date:
18th December 2024
Date of amendments:
Not specified
Year:
2023
Region / City:
United Kingdom
Theme:
Veterinary Nursing Skills
Document Type:
Guidance Document
Organization / Institution:
Royal College of Veterinary Surgeons (RCVS)
Author:
Royal College of Veterinary Surgeons (RCVS)
Target Audience:
Veterinary Nurses
Period of Validity:
Ongoing
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of Revisions:
Not specified
Year:
2021
Region / City:
Not specified
Topic:
Internship Orientation, Employability Skills
Document Type:
Facilitation Guide
Organization:
MHA Labs
Author:
Not specified
Target Audience:
Interns, Internship Coordinators
Duration:
6 weeks
Approval Date:
Not specified
Revision Date:
Not specified
Year:
2020
Region / City:
Switzerland
Topic:
Clinical research, human research projects
Document Type:
Report
Organization:
Swiss Clinical Trial Organisation (SCTO)
Author:
Education Platform of the Swiss Clinical Trial Organisation (SCTO)
Target Audience:
Clinical research professionals, project leaders, and researchers
Period of Validity:
Ongoing
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of Last Update:
Not specified
) and join the S1NET. For guides with in depth examinations of performance measure definitions, go to:
https://www.milsuite.mil/book/docs/DOC-129783
Table of Contents (Hyperlinks to Sections):
Developing ‘Significant Duties and Responsibilities’ OER Narratives: Notes, Rules, and Instructions OER Narrative Prohibited Techniques, Inconsistencies, No-Go’s: Negative Comment Rules Referred OERs Narrative Comment Examples Block a. APFT and HT/WT Block b. Overall Performance Block c. Character (to include SHARP comments) Block d. Presence Block e. Intellect Block f. Leads Block g. Develops Block h. Achieves Senior Rater Potential Senior Rater Narrative Examples Senior Rater Narrative Comment Examples (for potential, promotion, school, etc.) Successive Assignments Other SR Comments (explanations of anything unusual about OER) Effective Words for Evaluations JUNIOR OFFICER PLATE (DA FORM 67-10-1) NOTE: 2LTs who have NOT completed BOLC, will not receive an OER until they complete BOLC (AC and ARNG; USAR officers can receive an OER before completing BOLC). The FROM date will be their commissioning date. All time until their BOLC graduation will be NONRATED on their first OER. OER PROFILING: OERs: Rater and Senior Rater Profiles are CONSTRAINED, meaning Officers are only allowed to grant 49% of each rank they rate with either an “EXCELS” (as Rater) or “MOST QUALIFIED” (as Senior Rater). HOWEVER, if you have an immature profile, and have only just begun rating/senior rating Officers of a certain rank, you are allowed a ONE TIME option of giving one of the first two evaluations you make at a particular grade, an “EXCELS” (as Rater) or “MOST QUALIFIED” (as Senior Rater). OER (OER SUPPORT FORM) PART III: Developing ‘Significant Duties and Responsibilities’ (blocks a., b., and c.): Refer to DA PAM 611-21 (https://www.milsuite.mil/book/groups/smartbookdapam611-21
) and DA PAM 600-3 (Commissioned Officer Professional Development and Career Management), to assist in the development of PART III, block d. As a minimum, the duty description will include pr:
- Number of personnel supervised, - Amount of resources under the rated officer’s control, - Scope of responsibilities. 3) Descriptions must be clear and concise with emphasis on specific functions required. 4) Note conditions unique to the assignment; e.g. RA officers assigned to FT support duties with RC units or USAR officers assigned to RA units OER NARRATIVES: Notes, Rules, and Instructions Rater and Senior Rater Narratives: - Requires candor and courage; frank and accurate assessment. - Quantify officer’s value relative to peers and do so in concert with rater/senior rater box check. - Are short; tell a simple story about the quality of officer being evaluated. - Are interesting and compelling. - Are looked at by selection board members when they are looking for in-depth information about a rated officer’s performance and potential. - Numbers; 1-10, write them out (e.g. one, two, ten). 11 or higher, write the number; e.g. 11, 15, 105. Exception, when a 1-10 is WITH an 11 or higher; e.g. “5 tool kits with 20 tools each.” - Fashion the narrative to the officer; double check use of “he/his” vs. “she/hers.” - Awards: Awards and/or special recognition received during the rating period may be cited in evaluation comments (for example, “received the Humanitarian Service Medal” or “named the Instructor of the Year”). - Raters and SR CAN use the officer’s name in the narrative; e.g. “1LT Joe was ….” Rater and Rater Narratives: - Focus on PERFORMANCE; explaining what the rated officer did and how well he/she did it. - Focus on specifics to quantify and qualify performance. - Raters should advocate the rated officer to the SR. - When there is no SR (due to lack of qualifications), rater’s narrative provides the input on both performance and potential. Senior Rater (SR) and SR Narrative (see SR Rater Narrative section for examples): - Focus on POTENTIAL, 3-5 years out (promotions, command, school, & assignments). - Can amplify box checks by using the narrative to clearly send the appropriate message to selection boards. - CANNOT mention Box Check. - Additional information for when SR is also Rater can be found in DA PAM 623-3, pg. 26, “DA Form 67–10–1, part VI: block c—Senior Rater Narrative.” OER Narrative Prohibited Techniques, Inconsistencies, No-Go’s: - School/Course Comments: Bullets about how a Soldier did in a school or course are ONLY allowed if that school did not produce an AER/DA Form 1059. - Narratives are not a laundry list of superlatives – more is not necessarily better. - Brief, unqualified superlatives or phrases, particularly if they may be considered trite. - Excessive use of technical acronyms, or phrases not commonly recognized. - Techniques aimed at making specific words, phrases, or sentences stand out from the rest of the narrative; e.g. excessive use of capital letters; unnecessary quotation marks; repeated use of exclamation points; wide spacing between selected words, phrases, or sentences to include double spacing within a paragraph or between paragraphs. - Inappropriate references to box checks; e.g “Would be TOP BLOCK if profile allowed” or “absolutely far exceeded the standard”. - Trying to quantify (e.g. “top 2% of my captains”) with a small population. - Stay in your lane/level; avoid comments like “Best 1LT in the Army” unless you’re the Army CoS. - Stating “the best ever”; having 10 in the population, 50 in the profile. - Using overused phrases and clichés that are counterproductive or overused; e.g. stellar, historic, “delivered a dazzling performance,” “hit the ground running,” consummate professional, and unlimited potential. - Using specific selection board-type language. Examples of this include, “definitely a 6+ Soldier”. - Don’t exaggerate; “If I could prove it, CPT X is an LTC disguised as a CPT.” - Be mindful of what IS NOT said; it can have the same impact as what is said; e.g. NOT having numbers, or quantifiable points. - Don’t say the sa
Note:
en
Topic:
Officer Evaluation, Narrative Guidelines
Document Type:
Guide
Target Audience:
Raters, Senior Raters
Year:
2026
Region / city:
Global
Theme:
Education, Healthcare
Document Type:
Guideline
Author:
Not specified
Target Audience:
Healthcare educators, trainers, facilitators
Period of validity:
Ongoing
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of changes:
Not specified
Year:
2023
Region / city:
United States
Topic:
MDS 2023 Updates, Training Plan Design
Document Type:
Guidelines
Organization / Institution:
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS)
Author:
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS)
Target Audience:
Healthcare facilities, staff involved in resident care
Effective Period:
Ongoing
Approval Date:
Not specified
Revision Date:
Not specified
Note:
Year
Topic:
Competency assessment, audit, Corporations Act
Document type:
Logbook, guidance
Target audience:
Applicants for RCA registration, assessors
Period of validity:
3–5 years