№ lp_1_2_46636
File format: docx
Character count: 7444
File size: 456 KB
This memorandum addresses the transition from the Data Universal Numbering System (DUNS) to the Unique Entity Identifier (UEI) required for Child Nutrition Program operators to receive federal payments.
Year:
2023
Region / City:
Alexandria, VA
Topic:
Transition to Unique Entity Identifier (UEI)
Document Type:
Memorandum
Issuing Agency:
Food and Nutrition Service (FNS), Child Nutrition Programs
Author:
Jessica Saracino, Lynn Rodgers-Kuperman
Target Audience:
Regional Directors, State Directors, Child Nutrition Program Operators
Effective Period:
April 2022 - Ongoing
Date of Approval:
March 20, 2023
Date of Changes:
N/A
Price: 8 / 10 USD
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
Don’t have cryptocurrency yet?
You can still complete your purchase in a few minutes:- Buy Crypto in a trusted app (Coinbase, Kraken, Cash App or any similar service).
- In the app, tap Send.
- Select network, paste our wallet address.
- Send the exact amount shown above.
The final amount may vary slightly depending on the payment method.
The file will be sent to the email address provided at checkout within 24 hours.
The product description is provided for reference. Actual content and formatting may differ slightly.
Year:
2003
Jurisdiction:
Victoria, Australia
Document type:
Application form / Regulatory form
Regulation:
Cemeteries and Crematoria Regulations 2025, Regulation 30
Issuing authority:
Victorian Government
Related legislation:
Births, Deaths and Marriages Registration Act 1996; Coroners Act 2008; Privacy and Data Protection Act 2014; Public Records Act 1973
Purpose:
Authorisation of cremation for deceased persons
Attachments required:
Notice of death, Certificate of registered medical practitioner, Coroner’s order, notice of still-birth (if applicable)
Penalties:
False statements punishable under section 132 of the Cemeteries and Crematoria Act 2003
Applicant type:
Natural person or corporate body
Cremation details:
Name of crematorium, date of cremation, place and type of interment
Contact information:
Applicant and funeral director details, including address, telephone, and email
Region:
Colorado
Jurisdiction:
State of Colorado
Document type:
Procedural guidance
Subject:
Educator identification numbers
Programs and systems:
Educator Identification System (EDIS)
Responsible organizations:
Colorado Department of Education (CDE); Charter School Institute (CSI)
Participating entities:
Public schools; charter schools
Target audience:
School data submissions contacts; school administrative staff
Scope:
Assignment and update of educator identification data
Data elements referenced:
Name; date of birth; gender; SSN
Submission method:
EDID templates via Google Drive
Processing timeframe:
Typically 1–2 business days
Applicability period:
Ongoing
Source type:
Administrative process documentation
Year:
2022
Region / City:
United States
Topic:
Entity Registration, Federal Government
Document Type:
Fact Sheet
Organization / Institution:
Federal Government, SAM.gov
Author:
Unknown
Target Audience:
Organizations doing business with the Federal Government
Effective Period:
April 4, 2022
Approval Date:
Unknown
Amendment Date:
Unknown
Note:
Year
Document Type:
Proposal
Year:
2025
Region / city:
United Kingdom
Topic:
Public procurement
Document type:
Invitation to tender (ITT)
Organization / institution:
CCS (Crown Commercial Service)
Author:
Crown Commercial Service (CCS)
Target audience:
Potential bidders for G-Cloud 15
Period of validity:
23/10/2025 – 30/01/2026
Approval date:
23/10/2025
Amendment date:
N/A
Note:
Year
Topic:
Vocational Education and Training (VET), Education Policy
Document Type:
Factsheet
Organization / Institution:
Australian Government
Target Audience:
Parents, Students, Educational Institutions
Year:
2015
Region / City:
Australia
Topic:
Vocational Education and Training (VET), USI
Document Type:
FAQ
Author:
Australian Government
Target Audience:
VET students, Registered Training Organisations (RTOs)
Date of Approval:
Not specified
Date of Changes:
Not specified
Note:
Description
Year:
2020
Region / City:
Northern Ireland
Topic:
Agricultural business registration
Document Type:
Application form
Issuing Authority:
Department of Agriculture, Environment and Rural Affairs (DAERA)
Author:
Department of Agriculture, Environment and Rural Affairs (DAERA)
Target Audience:
Individuals or entities registering a small-scale farm business without claiming grants or subsidies
Period of Validity:
Not specified
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of Amendments:
Not specified
Year:
2025
Organization:
Department of Agriculture, Environment and Rural Affairs (DAERA)
Document type:
Application form
Target audience:
Farmers and commercial horticulture producers in Northern Ireland
Purpose:
Request a DAERA Business Identifier to claim agricultural or horticultural subsidies
Submission deadline:
15 May 2025
Eligibility criteria:
Minimum age 18 for at least one business member; minimum land requirements for Category 1 business; compliance with legal and operational separateness rules
Supporting documents:
Lease agreements, proof of identity, herd/flock registration if applicable
Contact email:
[email protected]
Year:
2022
Region / city:
United States
Topic:
Government transition to new entity identifier system
Document type:
Fact Sheet
Author:
Federal Government
Target audience:
Entities doing business with the Federal Government
Effective period:
From April 4, 2022
Approval date:
N/A
Amendment date:
N/A
Year:
2022
Region / City:
United States
Topic:
Federal award management, entity registration
Document Type:
Fact Sheet
Agency / Institution:
Federal Government
Author:
Not specified
Target Audience:
Entities doing business with the Federal Government
Validity Period:
April 4, 2022 - ongoing
Approval Date:
Not specified
Modification Date:
Not specified
Year:
2014
Region / City:
N/A
Topic:
ITU-T, IEEE Standards, MAC Addresses, Protocol Identifiers
Document Type:
Technical Specification
Organization / Institution:
ITU-T
Author:
N/A
Target Audience:
Technical experts, network engineers, IEEE/ITU-T standard users
Period of Validity:
N/A
Approval Date:
N/A
Amendment Date:
N/A
Context:
A technical document detailing the use of IEEE-assigned Organizationally Unique Identifier (OUI) for generating MAC addresses and protocol identifiers as per IEEE and ITU-T standards.
Year:
2014
Organization:
ITU-T
Type of document:
Technical specification
Standard references:
IEEE Std 802TM-2014, IEEE Std 802.3TM-2012, IEEE Std 1588TM-2008
Scope:
Local and Metropolitan Area Networks, MAC addresses, Protocol Identifiers, Slow Protocols, OAM, MAC Control, IEEE 1588 profiles
Assigned OUI:
00-19-A7
Protocol subtypes:
OMCI, Backchannel Data, SSM, BACP
Document format:
Technical frames and tables with octet-level specifications
Tracking No:
2023-229-BWCA-002-F
Date:
January 26, 2024
Applicant:
Bayer West-Central Africa S.A.
Organism:
Maize (Zea mays)
Trait:
Resistance to Coleoptera, Tolerance to Glyphosate
Genes:
cp4 epsps, cry3Bb1, DvSnf7
Food and Feed Safety:
Compositional considerations for Maize
Approval History:
Argentina, Australia-New Zealand, Brazil, Canada, Colombia, European Union, Japan, Mexico, Paraguay, Philippines, Republic of Korea, USA, Vietnam
Date of First Approval:
August 06, 2015 (Australia-New Zealand)
Assessment Summary:
Safety and nutritional assessments confirm the event is as safe as its conventional counterpart.
Recommended Terms and Conditions:
Limited to food, feed, and processing use; not for cultivation; compliance with biosafety regulations required.
Year:
2024
Region / City:
Ghana
Theme:
Genetically Modified Organisms, Food Safety
Document Type:
Risk Assessment Report
Organization:
Technical Advisory Committee (TAC)
Author:
Not specified
Target Audience:
National Biosafety Authority, Regulatory Authorities
Period of Validity:
3 years
Approval Date:
January 26, 2024
Date of Amendments:
None
) and join the S1NET. For guides with in depth examinations of performance measure definitions, go to:
https://www.milsuite.mil/book/docs/DOC-129783
Table of Contents (Hyperlinks to Sections):
Developing ‘Significant Duties and Responsibilities’ OER Narratives: Notes, Rules, and Instructions OER Narrative Prohibited Techniques, Inconsistencies, No-Go’s: Negative Comment Rules Referred OERs Narrative Comment Examples Block a. APFT and HT/WT Block b. Overall Performance Block c. Character (to include SHARP comments) Block d. Presence Block e. Intellect Block f. Leads Block g. Develops Block h. Achieves Senior Rater Potential Senior Rater Narrative Examples Senior Rater Narrative Comment Examples (for potential, promotion, school, etc.) Successive Assignments Other SR Comments (explanations of anything unusual about OER) Effective Words for Evaluations JUNIOR OFFICER PLATE (DA FORM 67-10-1) NOTE: 2LTs who have NOT completed BOLC, will not receive an OER until they complete BOLC (AC and ARNG; USAR officers can receive an OER before completing BOLC). The FROM date will be their commissioning date. All time until their BOLC graduation will be NONRATED on their first OER. OER PROFILING: OERs: Rater and Senior Rater Profiles are CONSTRAINED, meaning Officers are only allowed to grant 49% of each rank they rate with either an “EXCELS” (as Rater) or “MOST QUALIFIED” (as Senior Rater). HOWEVER, if you have an immature profile, and have only just begun rating/senior rating Officers of a certain rank, you are allowed a ONE TIME option of giving one of the first two evaluations you make at a particular grade, an “EXCELS” (as Rater) or “MOST QUALIFIED” (as Senior Rater). OER (OER SUPPORT FORM) PART III: Developing ‘Significant Duties and Responsibilities’ (blocks a., b., and c.): Refer to DA PAM 611-21 (https://www.milsuite.mil/book/groups/smartbookdapam611-21
) and DA PAM 600-3 (Commissioned Officer Professional Development and Career Management), to assist in the development of PART III, block d. As a minimum, the duty description will include pr:
- Number of personnel supervised, - Amount of resources under the rated officer’s control, - Scope of responsibilities. 3) Descriptions must be clear and concise with emphasis on specific functions required. 4) Note conditions unique to the assignment; e.g. RA officers assigned to FT support duties with RC units or USAR officers assigned to RA units OER NARRATIVES: Notes, Rules, and Instructions Rater and Senior Rater Narratives: - Requires candor and courage; frank and accurate assessment. - Quantify officer’s value relative to peers and do so in concert with rater/senior rater box check. - Are short; tell a simple story about the quality of officer being evaluated. - Are interesting and compelling. - Are looked at by selection board members when they are looking for in-depth information about a rated officer’s performance and potential. - Numbers; 1-10, write them out (e.g. one, two, ten). 11 or higher, write the number; e.g. 11, 15, 105. Exception, when a 1-10 is WITH an 11 or higher; e.g. “5 tool kits with 20 tools each.” - Fashion the narrative to the officer; double check use of “he/his” vs. “she/hers.” - Awards: Awards and/or special recognition received during the rating period may be cited in evaluation comments (for example, “received the Humanitarian Service Medal” or “named the Instructor of the Year”). - Raters and SR CAN use the officer’s name in the narrative; e.g. “1LT Joe was ….” Rater and Rater Narratives: - Focus on PERFORMANCE; explaining what the rated officer did and how well he/she did it. - Focus on specifics to quantify and qualify performance. - Raters should advocate the rated officer to the SR. - When there is no SR (due to lack of qualifications), rater’s narrative provides the input on both performance and potential. Senior Rater (SR) and SR Narrative (see SR Rater Narrative section for examples): - Focus on POTENTIAL, 3-5 years out (promotions, command, school, & assignments). - Can amplify box checks by using the narrative to clearly send the appropriate message to selection boards. - CANNOT mention Box Check. - Additional information for when SR is also Rater can be found in DA PAM 623-3, pg. 26, “DA Form 67–10–1, part VI: block c—Senior Rater Narrative.” OER Narrative Prohibited Techniques, Inconsistencies, No-Go’s: - School/Course Comments: Bullets about how a Soldier did in a school or course are ONLY allowed if that school did not produce an AER/DA Form 1059. - Narratives are not a laundry list of superlatives – more is not necessarily better. - Brief, unqualified superlatives or phrases, particularly if they may be considered trite. - Excessive use of technical acronyms, or phrases not commonly recognized. - Techniques aimed at making specific words, phrases, or sentences stand out from the rest of the narrative; e.g. excessive use of capital letters; unnecessary quotation marks; repeated use of exclamation points; wide spacing between selected words, phrases, or sentences to include double spacing within a paragraph or between paragraphs. - Inappropriate references to box checks; e.g “Would be TOP BLOCK if profile allowed” or “absolutely far exceeded the standard”. - Trying to quantify (e.g. “top 2% of my captains”) with a small population. - Stay in your lane/level; avoid comments like “Best 1LT in the Army” unless you’re the Army CoS. - Stating “the best ever”; having 10 in the population, 50 in the profile. - Using overused phrases and clichés that are counterproductive or overused; e.g. stellar, historic, “delivered a dazzling performance,” “hit the ground running,” consummate professional, and unlimited potential. - Using specific selection board-type language. Examples of this include, “definitely a 6+ Soldier”. - Don’t exaggerate; “If I could prove it, CPT X is an LTC disguised as a CPT.” - Be mindful of what IS NOT said; it can have the same impact as what is said; e.g. NOT having numbers, or quantifiable points. - Don’t say the sa
Note:
en
Topic:
Officer Evaluation, Narrative Guidelines
Document Type:
Guide
Target Audience:
Raters, Senior Raters
Year:
2022
Region / City:
Wales
Topic:
Education
Document Type:
Recruitment Pack
Organization / Institution:
Estyn
Author:
Owen Evans, Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education and Training
Target Audience:
Prospective applicants for the role of Her Majesty’s Inspector of Education and Training
Period of Validity:
Ongoing
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of Changes:
Not specified
Year:
2022
Region / City:
United States
Topic:
Entity Registration, Federal Government
Document Type:
Fact Sheet
Organization / Institution:
Federal Government, SAM.gov
Author:
Unknown
Target Audience:
Organizations doing business with the Federal Government
Effective Period:
April 4, 2022
Approval Date:
Unknown
Amendment Date:
Unknown
Note:
Year
Document Type:
Proposal
Note:
(If there are multiple corresponding authors then nominate one for communication with the editorial office.)Received date; Revised date; Editorial decision date.